High precision binding energies from physical-feature-instructed machine learning

Twelve physics-informed machine learning models have been trained to model binding energy residuals. Our approach begins with determining the difference between measured experimental binding energies and three different mass models. Then four machine learning approaches are used to train on each energy difference. The most successful ML technique, both in interpolation and extrapolation, is the least squares boosted ensemble of trees. The best model resulting from that technique utilizes eight physical features to model the difference between experimental atomic binding energy values in AME 2012 and the Duflo Zuker mass model. This resulted in a model that fit the training data with a standard deviation of 17 keV and that has a standard deviation of 92 keV when compared all of the values in the AME 2020. The extrapolation capability of each model is discussed, and the accuracy of predicting new mass measurements has also been tested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. C
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.111.034305
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High precision binding energies from physical-feature-instructed machine learning

Ian Bentley, J. M. Tedder, M. Gebran, Ayan Paul
5 citations
Physical review. C
Nuclear physics research studies
9.35
article

High precision binding energies from physical-feature-instructed machine learning

Ian Bentley, J. M. Tedder, M. Gebran, Ayan Paul
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Twelve physics-informed machine learning models have been trained to model binding energy residuals. Our approach begins with determining the difference between measured experimental binding energies and three different mass models. Then four machine learning approaches are used to train on each energy difference. The most successful ML technique, both in interpolation and extrapolation, is the least squares boosted ensemble of trees. The best model resulting from that technique utilizes eight physical features to model the difference between experimental atomic binding energy values in AME 2012 and the Duflo Zuker mass model. This resulted in a model that fit the training data with a standard deviation of 17 keV and that has a standard deviation of 92 keV when compared all of the values in the AME 2020. The extrapolation capability of each model is discussed, and the accuracy of predicting new mass measurements has also been tested.

Physical review. CVol. 111(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Northeastern University (US), Harvard University (US), Florida Polytechnic University (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX), Saint Mary's College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nuclear physics research studies
9.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.