Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening

The favorable attitude towards RB CCS among stakeholders provides a strong foundation for advancing its development. However, a comprehensive strategy emphasizing the generation of robust evidence, strengthening healthcare infrastructure, prioritizing patient empowerment, and cultivating a collaborative environment built on trust is crucial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317986
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening

Kadri Suija, Anda Ķīvīte‐Urtāne, L Malina, Anna Markina et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
1.05
article

Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening

Kadri Suija, Anda Ķīvīte‐Urtāne, L Malina, Anna Markina, Gunvor Aasbø, Anneli Uusküla, Mindaugas Stankūnas, Mari Nygård, Anna Tisler, Maali-Liina Remmel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The favorable attitude towards RB CCS among stakeholders provides a strong foundation for advancing its development. However, a comprehensive strategy emphasizing the generation of robust evidence, strengthening healthcare infrastructure, prioritizing patient empowerment, and cultivating a collaborative environment built on trust is crucial.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT), University of Eastern Finland (FI), University of Oslo (NO), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), University of Tartu (EE)
EEA Grants/Norway Grants
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening — Kadri Suija, Anda Ķīvīte‐Urtāne, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS