Which Money to Follow? Evaluating Country-Specific Vulnerabilities to Illicit Financial Flows

Abstract This study presents a new, multidisciplinary method to assess countries’ vulnerabilities to illicit financial flows (IFFs) in different economic channels. Acknowledging that money laundering involves legitimate financial channels and regulatory gaps, our approach combines quantitative data on bilateral economic activities with a qualitative assessment of the regulatory frameworks of trade and investment partners. Using publicly available and contemporary data along with a legal analysis focused on the loopholes that can be exploited for IFFs, the proposed methodology addresses the limitations of current National Risk Assessments (NRAs) and offers an accessible and cost-effective approach that can be applied for anti-money laundering. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by analyzing IFF vulnerabilities in Nigerian inward foreign direct investment, Brazilian outward portfolio investment, and Indonesian imports demonstrating its potential to refine and enhance National Risk Assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-024-09610-z
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Money to Follow? Evaluating Country-Specific Vulnerabilities to Illicit Financial Flows

Alison Schultz, Nara Monkam, Verónica Grondona, Markus Meinzer et al.
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

Which Money to Follow? Evaluating Country-Specific Vulnerabilities to Illicit Financial Flows

Alison Schultz, Nara Monkam, Verónica Grondona, Markus Meinzer, Gonzalo Villanueva
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents a new, multidisciplinary method to assess countries’ vulnerabilities to illicit financial flows (IFFs) in different economic channels. Acknowledging that money laundering involves legitimate financial channels and regulatory gaps, our approach combines quantitative data on bilateral economic activities with a qualitative assessment of the regulatory frameworks of trade and investment partners. Using publicly available and contemporary data along with a legal analysis focused on the loopholes that can be exploited for IFFs, the proposed methodology addresses the limitations of current National Risk Assessments (NRAs) and offers an accessible and cost-effective approach that can be applied for anti-money laundering. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by analyzing IFF vulnerabilities in Nigerian inward foreign direct investment, Brazilian outward portfolio investment, and Indonesian imports demonstrating its potential to refine and enhance National Risk Assessments.

European Journal on Criminal Policy and ResearchVol. 31(4)
Tax Justice Network (NO), University of Pretoria (ZA)
University of Pretoria
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Money to Follow? Evaluating Country-Specific Vulnerabilities to Illicit Financial Flows — Alison Schultz, Nara Monkam, et al. · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS