The Impact of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy on Survival After Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Propensity Score Matched Analysis

<b>Purpose:</b> To investigate the impact of paratracheal lymphadenectomy on survival in patients undergoing an esophagectomy for cancer. The secondary objective was to assess the effect on short-term outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Between 2011-2017, patients with an esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma treated with elective transthoracic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy were included from the Dutch Upper Gastro-intestinal Cancer Audit registry. After 1:1 propensity score matching of patients with and without paratracheal lymphadenectomy within histologic subgroups, short-term outcomes and overall survival were compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1154 patients with adenocarcinoma and 294 patients with squamous cell carcinoma were matched. Lymph node yield was significantly higher (22 versus 19 nodes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in patients with paratracheal lymphadenectomy for both tumor types. Paratracheal lymphadenectomy was associated with more recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (10% versus 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and chylothorax in patients with adenocarcinoma (10% versus 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and with more anastomotic leakage in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (42% versus 27%, <i>p</i> = 0.014). The 3- and 5-year survival in patients with and without a paratracheal lymphadenectomy were for adenocarcinoma, respectively, 58% versus 56% and 48% in both groups (log rank: <i>p</i> = 0.578) and for patients with a squamous cell carcinoma, 62% in both groups and 57% versus 54% (log rank: <i>p</i> = 0.668). <b>Conclusions:</b> The addition of paratracheal lymphadenectomy significantly increases lymph node yield in transthoracic esophagectomy but did not result in improved survival for esophageal cancer patients in the current dataset. However, there was an increase in postoperative morbidity in patients who underwent a paratracheal lymphadenectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050888
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy on Survival After Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Alicia S. Borggreve, Suzanne Sarah Gisbertz, B. Feike Kingma et al.
3 citations
Cancers
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
6.02
article

The Impact of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy on Survival After Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Alicia S. Borggreve, Suzanne Sarah Gisbertz, B. Feike Kingma, Richard van Hillegersberg, Eliza Hagens, Jelle P. H. Ruurda
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> To investigate the impact of paratracheal lymphadenectomy on survival in patients undergoing an esophagectomy for cancer. The secondary objective was to assess the effect on short-term outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Between 2011-2017, patients with an esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma treated with elective transthoracic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy were included from the Dutch Upper Gastro-intestinal Cancer Audit registry. After 1:1 propensity score matching of patients with and without paratracheal lymphadenectomy within histologic subgroups, short-term outcomes and overall survival were compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1154 patients with adenocarcinoma and 294 patients with squamous cell carcinoma were matched. Lymph node yield was significantly higher (22 versus 19 nodes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in patients with paratracheal lymphadenectomy for both tumor types. Paratracheal lymphadenectomy was associated with more recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (10% versus 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and chylothorax in patients with adenocarcinoma (10% versus 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and with more anastomotic leakage in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (42% versus 27%, <i>p</i> = 0.014). The 3- and 5-year survival in patients with and without a paratracheal lymphadenectomy were for adenocarcinoma, respectively, 58% versus 56% and 48% in both groups (log rank: <i>p</i> = 0.578) and for patients with a squamous cell carcinoma, 62% in both groups and 57% versus 54% (log rank: <i>p</i> = 0.668). <b>Conclusions:</b> The addition of paratracheal lymphadenectomy significantly increases lymph node yield in transthoracic esophagectomy but did not result in improved survival for esophageal cancer patients in the current dataset. However, there was an increase in postoperative morbidity in patients who underwent a paratracheal lymphadenectomy.

CancersVol. 17(5)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.