Innovative Binocular Vision Testing for Phoria and Vergence Ranges Using Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms

This study evaluated binocular visual function using automatic dual rotational Risley prisms (ADRRPs) to measure phoria and vergence ranges. Thirty-nine (mean age: 21.82 ± 1.10 years; age range: 20-24 years) healthy adults with normal binocular vision participated. Each underwent baseline refraction exams followed by phoria and vergence tests conducted using both a phoropter with Maddox rods and the ADRRPs. The results revealed a strong positive correlation between the two instruments for distance phoria (r = 0.959, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and near-phoria measurements (r = 0.968, <i>p</i> < 0.001). For vergence testing, positive fusional vergence (PFV) at distance showed a moderate-to-strong correlation for break points (r = 0.758, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a moderate correlation for recovery points (r = 0.452, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Negative fusional vergence (NFV) at distance demonstrated a strong correlation for break points (r = 0.863, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a moderate correlation for recovery points (r = 0.458, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Near-vergence testing showed moderate-to-strong correlations for break points (r = 0.777, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and recovery points (r = 0.623, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The inclusion of Bland-Altman analysis provides a more comprehensive evaluation of agreement between ADRRPs and the phoropter. While strong correlations were observed, systematic bias and LoA indicate that these methods are not perfectly interchangeable. The ADRRPs demonstrated potential for binocular vision assessment but require further validation for clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051604
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative Binocular Vision Testing for Phoria and Vergence Ranges Using Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms

Hui-Rong Su, Chi‐Hung Lee, Yu-Jung Chen, Y. Hu et al.
Sensors
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Innovative Binocular Vision Testing for Phoria and Vergence Ranges Using Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms

Hui-Rong Su, Chi‐Hung Lee, Yu-Jung Chen, Y. Hu, Shuan-Yu Huang, Shang-Min Yeh
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated binocular visual function using automatic dual rotational Risley prisms (ADRRPs) to measure phoria and vergence ranges. Thirty-nine (mean age: 21.82 ± 1.10 years; age range: 20-24 years) healthy adults with normal binocular vision participated. Each underwent baseline refraction exams followed by phoria and vergence tests conducted using both a phoropter with Maddox rods and the ADRRPs. The results revealed a strong positive correlation between the two instruments for distance phoria (r = 0.959, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and near-phoria measurements (r = 0.968, <i>p</i> < 0.001). For vergence testing, positive fusional vergence (PFV) at distance showed a moderate-to-strong correlation for break points (r = 0.758, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a moderate correlation for recovery points (r = 0.452, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Negative fusional vergence (NFV) at distance demonstrated a strong correlation for break points (r = 0.863, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a moderate correlation for recovery points (r = 0.458, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Near-vergence testing showed moderate-to-strong correlations for break points (r = 0.777, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and recovery points (r = 0.623, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The inclusion of Bland-Altman analysis provides a more comprehensive evaluation of agreement between ADRRPs and the phoropter. While strong correlations were observed, systematic bias and LoA indicate that these methods are not perfectly interchangeable. The ADRRPs demonstrated potential for binocular vision assessment but require further validation for clinical application.

SensorsVol. 25(5)
Feng Chia University (TW), Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW), Chung Shan Medical University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.