SMEFT predictions for semileptonic processes

The <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>S</a:mi><a:mi>U</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>2</a:mn><a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo><a:mi>L</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo>×</a:mo><a:mi>U</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn><a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo><a:mi>Y</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> invariance of the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) predicts multiple restrictions in the space of Wilson coefficients of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi>U</g:mi><g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo><g:mn>1</g:mn><g:msub><g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo><g:mrow><g:mi>e</g:mi><g:mi>m</g:mi></g:mrow></g:msub></g:math> invariant effective Lagrangians such as the low-energy effective field theory (LEFT), used for low-energy flavor physics observables, or the Higgs effective field theory (HEFT) in unitary gauge, appropriate for weak-scale observables. In this work, we derive and list all such predictions for semileptonic operators up to dimension 6. These predictions can be expressed as linear relations among the HEFT/LEFT Wilson coefficients (WCs), that are completely independent of any assumptions about the alignment of the mass and flavor bases. We find seven sets of relations among the WCs of vector operators, nine sets with scalar and tensor operators, and two sets with the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mi>Z</k:mi><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:msup><k:mi>W</k:mi><k:mo>±</k:mo></k:msup></k:math> couplings. These correspond to 2223 linear relations among the complex WCs when the quark and lepton generation indices are included. They connect diverse experimental searches such as rare meson decays, high-<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi></m:msub></m:math> dilepton searches, top decays, <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>Z</o:mi></o:math>-pole observables, charged lepton flavor violating observables, and nonstandard neutrino interaction searches. We demonstrate how these relations can be used to derive strong indirect constraints on multiple WCs that are currently either weakly constrained from direct experiments or have no direct bound at all. They also imply, in general, that evidence for new physics in a particular search channel must be accompanied by correlated anomalies in other channels. For example, the observed excess in <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>B</q:mi><q:mo stretchy="false">→</q:mo><q:mi>K</q:mi><q:mi>ν</q:mi><q:mover accent="true"><q:mi>ν</q:mi><q:mo stretchy="false">¯</q:mo></q:mover></q:math> would imply possible anomalies in <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>B</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">→</v:mo><v:msup><v:mi>D</v:mi><v:mrow><v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo><v:mo>*</v:mo><v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo></v:mrow></v:msup><v:mo>ℓ</v:mo><v:msub><v:mi>ν</v:mi><v:mo>ℓ</v:mo></v:msub></v:math>, <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi>B</ab:mi><ab:mo stretchy="false">→</ab:mo><ab:msup><ab:mi>K</ab:mi><ab:mrow><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:mo>*</ab:mo><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo></ab:mrow></ab:msup><ab:msup><ab:mo>ℓ</ab:mo><ab:mo>+</ab:mo></ab:msup><ab:msup><ab:mo>ℓ</ab:mo><ab:mo>−</ab:mo></ab:msup></ab:math>, <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:msub><fb:mi>B</fb:mi><fb:mi>q</fb:mi></fb:msub><fb:mo stretchy="false">→</fb:mo><fb:mi>τ</fb:mi><fb:msub><fb:mi>ν</fb:mi><fb:mi>τ</fb:mi></fb:msub></fb:math>, <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ib:msub><ib:mi>B</ib:mi><ib:mi>s</ib:mi></ib:msub><ib:mo stretchy="false">→</ib:mo><ib:msup><ib:mi>τ</ib:mi><ib:mo>+</ib:mo></ib:msup><ib:msup><ib:mi>τ</ib:mi><ib:mo>−</ib:mo></ib:msup></ib:math>, <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:msub><lb:mi>D</lb:mi><lb:mi>s</lb:mi></lb:msub><lb:mo stretchy="false">→</lb:mo><lb:msup><lb:mi>τ</lb:mi><lb:mo>+</lb:mo></lb:msup><lb:msub><lb:mi>ν</lb:mi><lb:mi>τ</lb:mi></lb:msub></lb:math>, <ob:math xmlns:ob="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ob:mi>t</ob:mi><ob:mo stretchy="false">→</ob:mo><ob:mi>c</ob:mi><ob:msup><ob:mo>ℓ</ob:mo><ob:mo>+</ob:mo></ob:msup><ob:msup><ob:mo>ℓ</ob:mo><ob:mo>−</ob:mo></ob:msup></ob:math>, <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rb:mi>t</rb:mi><rb:mo stretchy="false">→</rb:mo><rb:mi>u</rb:mi><rb:msup><rb:mo>ℓ</rb:mo><rb:mo>+</rb:mo></rb:msup><rb:msup><rb:mo>ℓ</rb:mo><rb:mo>−</rb:mo></rb:msup></rb:math>, etc., correlated according to the relations obtained in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.055002
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SMEFT predictions for semileptonic processes

Rick S. Gupta, Amol Dighe, Siddhartha Karmakar
4 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
7.48
article

SMEFT predictions for semileptonic processes

Rick S. Gupta, Amol Dighe, Siddhartha Karmakar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>S</a:mi><a:mi>U</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>2</a:mn><a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo><a:mi>L</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo>×</a:mo><a:mi>U</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn><a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo><a:mi>Y</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> invariance of the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) predicts multiple restrictions in the space of Wilson coefficients of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi>U</g:mi><g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo><g:mn>1</g:mn><g:msub><g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo><g:mrow><g:mi>e</g:mi><g:mi>m</g:mi></g:mrow></g:msub></g:math> invariant effective Lagrangians such as the low-energy effective field theory (LEFT), used for low-energy flavor physics observables, or the Higgs effective field theory (HEFT) in unitary gauge, appropriate for weak-scale observables. In this work, we derive and list all such predictions for semileptonic operators up to dimension 6. These predictions can be expressed as linear relations among the HEFT/LEFT Wilson coefficients (WCs), that are completely independent of any assumptions about the alignment of the mass and flavor bases. We find seven sets of relations among the WCs of vector operators, nine sets with scalar and tensor operators, and two sets with the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mi>Z</k:mi><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:msup><k:mi>W</k:mi><k:mo>±</k:mo></k:msup></k:math> couplings. These correspond to 2223 linear relations among the complex WCs when the quark and lepton generation indices are included. They connect diverse experimental searches such as rare meson decays, high-<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi></m:msub></m:math> dilepton searches, top decays, <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>Z</o:mi></o:math>-pole observables, charged lepton flavor violating observables, and nonstandard neutrino interaction searches. We demonstrate how these relations can be used to derive strong indirect constraints on multiple WCs that are currently either weakly constrained from direct experiments or have no direct bound at all. They also imply, in general, that evidence for new physics in a particular search channel must be accompanied by correlated anomalies in other channels. For example, the observed excess in <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>B</q:mi><q:mo stretchy="false">→</q:mo><q:mi>K</q:mi><q:mi>ν</q:mi><q:mover accent="true"><q:mi>ν</q:mi><q:mo stretchy="false">¯</q:mo></q:mover></q:math> would imply possible anomalies in <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>B</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">→</v:mo><v:msup><v:mi>D</v:mi><v:mrow><v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo><v:mo>*</v:mo><v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo></v:mrow></v:msup><v:mo>ℓ</v:mo><v:msub><v:mi>ν</v:mi><v:mo>ℓ</v:mo></v:msub></v:math>, <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi>B</ab:mi><ab:mo stretchy="false">→</ab:mo><ab:msup><ab:mi>K</ab:mi><ab:mrow><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:mo>*</ab:mo><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo></ab:mrow></ab:msup><ab:msup><ab:mo>ℓ</ab:mo><ab:mo>+</ab:mo></ab:msup><ab:msup><ab:mo>ℓ</ab:mo><ab:mo>−</ab:mo></ab:msup></ab:math>, <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:msub><fb:mi>B</fb:mi><fb:mi>q</fb:mi></fb:msub><fb:mo stretchy="false">→</fb:mo><fb:mi>τ</fb:mi><fb:msub><fb:mi>ν</fb:mi><fb:mi>τ</fb:mi></fb:msub></fb:math>, <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ib:msub><ib:mi>B</ib:mi><ib:mi>s</ib:mi></ib:msub><ib:mo stretchy="false">→</ib:mo><ib:msup><ib:mi>τ</ib:mi><ib:mo>+</ib:mo></ib:msup><ib:msup><ib:mi>τ</ib:mi><ib:mo>−</ib:mo></ib:msup></ib:math>, <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:msub><lb:mi>D</lb:mi><lb:mi>s</lb:mi></lb:msub><lb:mo stretchy="false">→</lb:mo><lb:msup><lb:mi>τ</lb:mi><lb:mo>+</lb:mo></lb:msup><lb:msub><lb:mi>ν</lb:mi><lb:mi>τ</lb:mi></lb:msub></lb:math>, <ob:math xmlns:ob="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ob:mi>t</ob:mi><ob:mo stretchy="false">→</ob:mo><ob:mi>c</ob:mi><ob:msup><ob:mo>ℓ</ob:mo><ob:mo>+</ob:mo></ob:msup><ob:msup><ob:mo>ℓ</ob:mo><ob:mo>−</ob:mo></ob:msup></ob:math>, <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rb:mi>t</rb:mi><rb:mo stretchy="false">→</rb:mo><rb:mi>u</rb:mi><rb:msup><rb:mo>ℓ</rb:mo><rb:mo>+</rb:mo></rb:msup><rb:msup><rb:mo>ℓ</rb:mo><rb:mo>−</rb:mo></rb:msup></rb:math>, etc., correlated according to the relations obtained in this paper.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(5)
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
7.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.