Preliminary effects of mobile computerized cognitive training in adults with mild cognitive impairment: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Computerized cognitive training (cCT) is a non-invasive treatment strategy in which individuals repeatedly practice computer-based tasks targeting specific cognitive functions. While traditional face-to-face cognitive training is costly and accompanied by long waiting times, mobile cCT can improve the healthcare situation due to its accessibility and versatility. This interim analysis of the NeuroNation MED Effectiveness Study (NeNaE) explores the initial effects of a mobile, gamified cCT (NeuroNation MED) on cognitive and psychosocial outcomes in adults diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; ICD-10 code F06.7). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the intervention group (IG) performed 12 weeks of training with the NeuroNation MED app, while the control group (CG) served as a waiting group. This interim analysis included the first 50 participants (IG: n = 36; CG: n = 14). The primary outcome was the index score of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Screening Module (S-NAB). Alpha spending resulted in an alpha level of 0.00305 for this interim analysis. This analysis provided preliminary evidence suggesting potential benefits of the intervention, with the IG demonstrating a significant improvement in the S-NAB index score (t(35) = 3.17, p = 0.0028, Cohen's d = 0.53). However, ANCOVA revealed no significant group differences between IG and CG in the S-NAB index score (F(1, 47) = 5.39, p = 0.025, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.125). Additionally, the IG showed a significant mean decrease in subjective cognitive failures measured by the CFQ-D (MD = -10.56, SD = 18.82, t(35) = 3.21, p = 0.0029, Cohen's d = 0.53). ANCOVA showed no significant group difference in CFQ-D post-test scores when controlling for pre-test scores (F(1, 47) = 4.81, p = 0.033, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.095). Analyzing the full study data is crucial to determine the effectiveness of the NeuroNation MED application for MCI.Trial registrationDRKS00025133, Date of registration: November 5, 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02458-w
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary effects of mobile computerized cognitive training in adults with mild cognitive impairment: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Anika Steinert, Drin Ferizaj, Eva Maria Martin, Luis Perotti et al.
6 citations
BMC Psychology
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
12.71
article

Preliminary effects of mobile computerized cognitive training in adults with mild cognitive impairment: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Anika Steinert, Drin Ferizaj, Eva Maria Martin, Luis Perotti, Tilo Strobach, Oskar Stamm, Carsten Finke, Kathrin Finke
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Computerized cognitive training (cCT) is a non-invasive treatment strategy in which individuals repeatedly practice computer-based tasks targeting specific cognitive functions. While traditional face-to-face cognitive training is costly and accompanied by long waiting times, mobile cCT can improve the healthcare situation due to its accessibility and versatility. This interim analysis of the NeuroNation MED Effectiveness Study (NeNaE) explores the initial effects of a mobile, gamified cCT (NeuroNation MED) on cognitive and psychosocial outcomes in adults diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; ICD-10 code F06.7). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the intervention group (IG) performed 12 weeks of training with the NeuroNation MED app, while the control group (CG) served as a waiting group. This interim analysis included the first 50 participants (IG: n = 36; CG: n = 14). The primary outcome was the index score of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Screening Module (S-NAB). Alpha spending resulted in an alpha level of 0.00305 for this interim analysis. This analysis provided preliminary evidence suggesting potential benefits of the intervention, with the IG demonstrating a significant improvement in the S-NAB index score (t(35) = 3.17, p = 0.0028, Cohen's d = 0.53). However, ANCOVA revealed no significant group differences between IG and CG in the S-NAB index score (F(1, 47) = 5.39, p = 0.025, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.125). Additionally, the IG showed a significant mean decrease in subjective cognitive failures measured by the CFQ-D (MD = -10.56, SD = 18.82, t(35) = 3.21, p = 0.0029, Cohen's d = 0.53). ANCOVA showed no significant group difference in CFQ-D post-test scores when controlling for pre-test scores (F(1, 47) = 4.81, p = 0.033, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.095). Analyzing the full study data is crucial to determine the effectiveness of the NeuroNation MED application for MCI.Trial registrationDRKS00025133, Date of registration: November 5, 2021.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
12.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.