Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area– a broad evaluation of performance

Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area– a broad evaluation of performance

Per Molander
9 citations
The European Journal of Health Economics
Healthcare Policy and Management
28.18
article

Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area– a broad evaluation of performance

Per Molander
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.

The European Journal of Health EconomicsVol. 26(7)
Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (SE), Statisticon (Sweden) (SE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Healthcare Policy and Management
28.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.