Robust biogas upgrading process via homoacetogens against ammonia and sulfide toxicities

Using hydrogen derived from surplus green energy (e.g., solar and wind) to convert carbon dioxide to acetate via homoacetogens represents a promising technology for simultaneous biogas upgrading and biochemical production. However, effects of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia on activities of homoacetogens remain unknown, hindering their applications in biogas upgrading. This study investigated the impacts of ammonia and sulfide on homoacetogen-dominated microbial community for biogas upgrading process by combining short-term batch tests and long-term membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) operation. Results showed that sulfide concentrations ≤ 2 mM TDS (total dissolved sulfide) increased H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rates and acetate production both in the short-term and long-term tests. The relative abundance of Acetobacterium (typical homoacetogens) in the MBfR also increased from 30 % without TDS addition to 40 % with the addition of 2 mM TDS. These results suggest that sulfide addition (≤ 2 mM TDS) likely promoted the growth of homoacetogens, thereby enhancing the biogas upgrading efficiency. In terms of ammonia, results suggested that 0.5 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L has negligible impacts on the homoacetogens' activities, while concentrations ≥ 1 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L significantly inhibited homoacetogens' activities, resulting in negligible acetate production during the short-term tests. However, the long-term biogas upgrading performance remained unaffected by 1 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L. Moreover, with the simultaneous additions of typical concentrations of sulfide (2 mM TDS, equivalent to the H<sub>2</sub>S concentration of 0.8 % in biogas) and ammonia (1 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L, equivalent to the NH<sub>3</sub> concentration of 0.1 % in biogas) in raw biogas, our MBfR still achieved high H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> utilization efficiencies (95 % and 97 %, respectively) and acetate production rate (550 mg/L/d). These highlight the robustness of MBfR against ammonia and sulfide toxicities. Additionally, the injection of extra H<sub>2</sub> could alleviate the ammonia and sulfide inhibitions on homoacetogens with acetate production increased by 13-80 times. This provides a new strategy to enhance the tolerance of homoacetogens against high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. Collectively, our findings advance the understanding of the response of homoacetogens to ammonia and sulfide stress and facilitate the development of a resilient and efficient homoacetogen-mediated bioprocess for upgrading biogas to biomethane and chemicals simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123440
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust biogas upgrading process via homoacetogens against ammonia and sulfide toxicities

Jianhua Guo, Linjie Zhou, Mengxiong Wu
2 citations
Water Research
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
2.01
article

Robust biogas upgrading process via homoacetogens against ammonia and sulfide toxicities

Jianhua Guo, Linjie Zhou, Mengxiong Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using hydrogen derived from surplus green energy (e.g., solar and wind) to convert carbon dioxide to acetate via homoacetogens represents a promising technology for simultaneous biogas upgrading and biochemical production. However, effects of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia on activities of homoacetogens remain unknown, hindering their applications in biogas upgrading. This study investigated the impacts of ammonia and sulfide on homoacetogen-dominated microbial community for biogas upgrading process by combining short-term batch tests and long-term membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) operation. Results showed that sulfide concentrations ≤ 2 mM TDS (total dissolved sulfide) increased H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rates and acetate production both in the short-term and long-term tests. The relative abundance of Acetobacterium (typical homoacetogens) in the MBfR also increased from 30 % without TDS addition to 40 % with the addition of 2 mM TDS. These results suggest that sulfide addition (≤ 2 mM TDS) likely promoted the growth of homoacetogens, thereby enhancing the biogas upgrading efficiency. In terms of ammonia, results suggested that 0.5 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L has negligible impacts on the homoacetogens' activities, while concentrations ≥ 1 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L significantly inhibited homoacetogens' activities, resulting in negligible acetate production during the short-term tests. However, the long-term biogas upgrading performance remained unaffected by 1 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L. Moreover, with the simultaneous additions of typical concentrations of sulfide (2 mM TDS, equivalent to the H<sub>2</sub>S concentration of 0.8 % in biogas) and ammonia (1 g NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N/L, equivalent to the NH<sub>3</sub> concentration of 0.1 % in biogas) in raw biogas, our MBfR still achieved high H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> utilization efficiencies (95 % and 97 %, respectively) and acetate production rate (550 mg/L/d). These highlight the robustness of MBfR against ammonia and sulfide toxicities. Additionally, the injection of extra H<sub>2</sub> could alleviate the ammonia and sulfide inhibitions on homoacetogens with acetate production increased by 13-80 times. This provides a new strategy to enhance the tolerance of homoacetogens against high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. Collectively, our findings advance the understanding of the response of homoacetogens to ammonia and sulfide stress and facilitate the development of a resilient and efficient homoacetogen-mediated bioprocess for upgrading biogas to biomethane and chemicals simultaneously.

Water ResearchVol. 279
The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.