Identifying Predictors of Symptom and Cognitive Change Following a Single Session of Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations

Abstract Background The present study represents the first attempt to identify potential psychological predictors of change in interpretation bias and state worry following a single session of cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I), which is a computerised training to modify interpretation bias, using two samples of worry-prone young adults. Methods High worriers with a history of anxiety and/or depression (Study 1; N = 83) and worry-prone individuals (Study 2; N = 146) completed a single session of CBM-I training. Pre-training, they completed a battery of self-report measures and tasks that assessed key moderators of CBM responses: attentional control, cognitive flexibility, sensitivity to reward, and imagery ability. Levels of interpretation bias and state worry were also assessed pre and post training to index CBM-related changes. Results In study 1 a greater ability to imagine positive events and lower levels of cognitive flexibility at baseline were associated with a greater increase in positive interpretation bias. Lower levels of cognitive flexibility pre training were associated with greater reduction in state worry post training. In study 2 higher levels of cognitive flexibility and lower levels of responses to positive affect at baseline had greater increase in positive interpretation bias, but not reductions in worry post training. Conclusions In both studies, attentional control was not a significant predictor of change in interpretation bias or state worry following a single session of CBM-I training. There were differences in the role of cognitive flexibility, emotion-focused rumination and positive mental imagery in the two samples. Given non-replications, individual differences that predict change in near and far transfer outcomes require further research. Nevertheless, the present findings provide insights to improve the outcome of CBM-I. For instance, incorporating a longer imagery training or cognitive flexibility training may be helpful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-025-10585-2
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Predictors of Symptom and Cognitive Change Following a Single Session of Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations

Jennifer Y. F. Lau, Alicia M. Hughes, Colette R. Hirsch, Yun-Lin Wang et al.
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Identifying Predictors of Symptom and Cognitive Change Following a Single Session of Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations

Jennifer Y. F. Lau, Alicia M. Hughes, Colette R. Hirsch, Yun-Lin Wang, Katherine S. Young
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The present study represents the first attempt to identify potential psychological predictors of change in interpretation bias and state worry following a single session of cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I), which is a computerised training to modify interpretation bias, using two samples of worry-prone young adults. Methods High worriers with a history of anxiety and/or depression (Study 1; N = 83) and worry-prone individuals (Study 2; N = 146) completed a single session of CBM-I training. Pre-training, they completed a battery of self-report measures and tasks that assessed key moderators of CBM responses: attentional control, cognitive flexibility, sensitivity to reward, and imagery ability. Levels of interpretation bias and state worry were also assessed pre and post training to index CBM-related changes. Results In study 1 a greater ability to imagine positive events and lower levels of cognitive flexibility at baseline were associated with a greater increase in positive interpretation bias. Lower levels of cognitive flexibility pre training were associated with greater reduction in state worry post training. In study 2 higher levels of cognitive flexibility and lower levels of responses to positive affect at baseline had greater increase in positive interpretation bias, but not reductions in worry post training. Conclusions In both studies, attentional control was not a significant predictor of change in interpretation bias or state worry following a single session of CBM-I training. There were differences in the role of cognitive flexibility, emotion-focused rumination and positive mental imagery in the two samples. Given non-replications, individual differences that predict change in near and far transfer outcomes require further research. Nevertheless, the present findings provide insights to improve the outcome of CBM-I. For instance, incorporating a longer imagery training or cognitive flexibility training may be helpful.

Cognitive Therapy and ResearchVol. 49(5)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), Ming Chuan University (TW), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.