Forging Historical Truth: Samples from Early Modern and Modern Italian Art Literature

Drawing mostly on a number of factual and methodological contributions I have published over the years on the fabrication of visual and verbal documents in art history and/or on their interpretative manipulation, I provide a brief survey of case studies where documented facts clash against received but unsubstantiated wisdom. The sampling will be centered on Bolognese art and art literature from the 16th through to the 18th centuries. It will include the questioning of the assumed and yet unproven close relations between Cardinal Gabriele Paleotti’s pastoral and theological attitude and the Carracci reform of painting, i.e. the latter’s supposed allegiance to Counterreformation values; the actual impact and degree of pervasiveness of Counterreformation (with its nuanced, local interpretations) in different cultural contexts, like private literary academies (e.g. the Bolognese Accademia dei Gelati) or the production of new, uncodified and therefore unacceptable Old Testament iconographies in Bologna and elsewhere in Italy and Europe, from Germany, Switzerland, France and England to Poland and even Russia; the conflicting interpretations of the Carracci’s work produced by Bellori and Malvasia, and the political and cultural reasons why the former’s lies and inaccuracies have got and still get the upper hand in scholarly studies over the latter’s truth and accuracy; finally how Luigi Crespi, a notorious con-man, made his official debut in art literature in 1757 by systematically debunking Bellori’s last work, Descrizione delle immagini dipinte da Raffaelle d’Urbino (published posthumously in 1695). The last example stands to prove that “ it takes a thief to catch a thief”, and also how ineffectual telling the truth can be, when intellectual conformism, stubborn ignorance and oversemplification turn into the most effective allies of masterminded manipulation, helping lies to prevail and create consensus. Debunking is always swimming against the tide, ever since Lorenzo Valla wrote De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione (1440), whose impact on art history writing is witnessed by Lorenzo Ghiberti’s II Commentary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18688/aa2414-5-28
Primary Topic
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forging Historical Truth: Samples from Early Modern and Modern Italian Art Literature

Giovanna Perini Folesani
Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
article

Forging Historical Truth: Samples from Early Modern and Modern Italian Art Literature

Giovanna Perini Folesani
article en

Abstract

Drawing mostly on a number of factual and methodological contributions I have published over the years on the fabrication of visual and verbal documents in art history and/or on their interpretative manipulation, I provide a brief survey of case studies where documented facts clash against received but unsubstantiated wisdom. The sampling will be centered on Bolognese art and art literature from the 16th through to the 18th centuries. It will include the questioning of the assumed and yet unproven close relations between Cardinal Gabriele Paleotti’s pastoral and theological attitude and the Carracci reform of painting, i.e. the latter’s supposed allegiance to Counterreformation values; the actual impact and degree of pervasiveness of Counterreformation (with its nuanced, local interpretations) in different cultural contexts, like private literary academies (e.g. the Bolognese Accademia dei Gelati) or the production of new, uncodified and therefore unacceptable Old Testament iconographies in Bologna and elsewhere in Italy and Europe, from Germany, Switzerland, France and England to Poland and even Russia; the conflicting interpretations of the Carracci’s work produced by Bellori and Malvasia, and the political and cultural reasons why the former’s lies and inaccuracies have got and still get the upper hand in scholarly studies over the latter’s truth and accuracy; finally how Luigi Crespi, a notorious con-man, made his official debut in art literature in 1757 by systematically debunking Bellori’s last work, Descrizione delle immagini dipinte da Raffaelle d’Urbino (published posthumously in 1695). The last example stands to prove that “ it takes a thief to catch a thief”, and also how ineffectual telling the truth can be, when intellectual conformism, stubborn ignorance and oversemplification turn into the most effective allies of masterminded manipulation, helping lies to prevail and create consensus. Debunking is always swimming against the tide, ever since Lorenzo Valla wrote De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione (1440), whose impact on art history writing is witnessed by Lorenzo Ghiberti’s II Commentary.

Actual Problems of Theory and History of ArtVol. 14
University of Urbino (IT), Human Growth Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.