«Богатыри» В. М. Васнецова: взгляд с позиции археологии

The article is devoted to the influence of archaeological science on the process of creating ‘Bogatyrs’ (1898, State Tretyakov gallery), a famous painting by Viktor M. Vasnetsov. The author conducted a comparative analysis of the weapons and decorations depicted in the painting with real archaeological material. This analysis showed that the artist, while working on the canvas, used specific samples of archaeological antiquities in his painting Those objects belong to the Viking Age (9th − the first half of the 11th century) and Old Rus period (11th −14th centuries). It can be assumed that his choice was not accidental — the artist purposefully and objectively tried to recreate the material culture of the era to which the painting is dedicated. Information about the most part of the antiquities was published in various scientific papers, such as reports of archaeological works, publications of archaeological societies, the Imperial Archaeological Commission, etc. Though it is more likely that V. M. Vasnetsov turned not to scientific publications, but to those adapted for artists. ’Antiquities of the Russian State’, which was designed by F. G. Solntsev, and publications of V. A. Prokhorov were among them. The use of these very materials was mentioned by the artist himself in his letters to V. V. Stasov. The armor and weapons of the bogatyrs and the decoration complexes of the horse harness allow the author to conclude that V. M. Vasnetsov consciously used archaeological materials in his work on the canvas. Undoubtedly, the iconography of the images was influenced by the achievements of Slavonic-Russian archaeology. On the whole, the artist’s attempt to create a consistent image of the folk history corresponds well with the spirit of the national-romantic movement in painting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18688/aa2414-6-36
Primary Topic
European Linguistics and Anthropology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

«Богатыри» В. М. Васнецова: взгляд с позиции археологии

Полина Сергеевна Дрёмова
Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art
European Linguistics and Anthropology
article

«Богатыри» В. М. Васнецова: взгляд с позиции археологии

Полина Сергеевна Дрёмова
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the influence of archaeological science on the process of creating ‘Bogatyrs’ (1898, State Tretyakov gallery), a famous painting by Viktor M. Vasnetsov. The author conducted a comparative analysis of the weapons and decorations depicted in the painting with real archaeological material. This analysis showed that the artist, while working on the canvas, used specific samples of archaeological antiquities in his painting Those objects belong to the Viking Age (9th − the first half of the 11th century) and Old Rus period (11th −14th centuries). It can be assumed that his choice was not accidental — the artist purposefully and objectively tried to recreate the material culture of the era to which the painting is dedicated. Information about the most part of the antiquities was published in various scientific papers, such as reports of archaeological works, publications of archaeological societies, the Imperial Archaeological Commission, etc. Though it is more likely that V. M. Vasnetsov turned not to scientific publications, but to those adapted for artists. ’Antiquities of the Russian State’, which was designed by F. G. Solntsev, and publications of V. A. Prokhorov were among them. The use of these very materials was mentioned by the artist himself in his letters to V. V. Stasov. The armor and weapons of the bogatyrs and the decoration complexes of the horse harness allow the author to conclude that V. M. Vasnetsov consciously used archaeological materials in his work on the canvas. Undoubtedly, the iconography of the images was influenced by the achievements of Slavonic-Russian archaeology. On the whole, the artist’s attempt to create a consistent image of the folk history corresponds well with the spirit of the national-romantic movement in painting.

Actual Problems of Theory and History of ArtVol. 14
Institute of History of Material Culture (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
European Linguistics and Anthropology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.