A Comparison of Traditional and Modern Qur’anic Teaching Methods in Islamic Education

The evolving landscape of Islamic education necessitates an examination of traditional and modern Qur’anic teaching methods to address the demands of contemporary learners. Traditional methods, such as rote memorization (tahfiz) and teacher-centered approaches, have been central to Qur’anic education for centuries. In contrast, modern methods emphasize interactive and learner-centered pedagogies, incorporating technology and critical thinking. This study compares these approaches to evaluate their effectiveness in fostering Qur’anic understanding and engagement among students. The research aims to identify the strengths and limitations of both teaching methods, providing insights into their impact on students’ comprehension, retention, and spiritual connection with the Qur’an. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining surveys and interviews with students, teachers, and education experts across Islamic schools and institutions. Comparative analysis of classroom observations further enriched the findings. The results reveal that traditional methods excel in promoting memorization and discipline but often lack adaptability to diverse learning needs. Modern methods, while fostering critical thinking and engagement, face challenges in maintaining traditional values and spiritual depth. The study concludes that an integrative approach, combining the strengths of both methods, offers the most effective strategy for Qur’anic education in the modern era.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70177/jnis.v2i1.1843
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Traditional and Modern Qur’anic Teaching Methods in Islamic Education

Siti Noor Aini
2 citations
Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies
Education and Islamic Studies
17.85
article

A Comparison of Traditional and Modern Qur’anic Teaching Methods in Islamic Education

Siti Noor Aini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The evolving landscape of Islamic education necessitates an examination of traditional and modern Qur’anic teaching methods to address the demands of contemporary learners. Traditional methods, such as rote memorization (tahfiz) and teacher-centered approaches, have been central to Qur’anic education for centuries. In contrast, modern methods emphasize interactive and learner-centered pedagogies, incorporating technology and critical thinking. This study compares these approaches to evaluate their effectiveness in fostering Qur’anic understanding and engagement among students. The research aims to identify the strengths and limitations of both teaching methods, providing insights into their impact on students’ comprehension, retention, and spiritual connection with the Qur’an. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining surveys and interviews with students, teachers, and education experts across Islamic schools and institutions. Comparative analysis of classroom observations further enriched the findings. The results reveal that traditional methods excel in promoting memorization and discipline but often lack adaptability to diverse learning needs. Modern methods, while fostering critical thinking and engagement, face challenges in maintaining traditional values and spiritual depth. The study concludes that an integrative approach, combining the strengths of both methods, offers the most effective strategy for Qur’anic education in the modern era.

Journal of Noesantara Islamic StudiesVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Islamic Studies
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.