The role of predictors and cognitive conflicts on information sharing at cooperatives

This study examines the role of conflict predictors and cognitive conflicts, moderated by intra-work group affective conflicts, on information sharing at cooperatives. Structural equation modeling was applied to survey data with cooperative managers. Results demonstrate that predictors of task interdependence and mutuality among group members influence cognitive conflicts, contrasting with task types. Findings on mediation of cognitive conflicts in these relationships are similar. Moderation of cognitive conflicts in information sharing was not significant for affective conflicts. It is concluded that predictors and cognitive conflicts can be beneficial when establishing conditions to expand information sharing, which requires balance in intragroup conflicts. These results have implications mainly for managing predictors and cognitive conflicts with a view to their effectiveness in intragroup communication at cooperatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Estudios Gerenciales
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2024.173.6712
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of predictors and cognitive conflicts on information sharing at cooperatives

Ilse María Beuren, Renata Mendes de Oliveira
Estudios Gerenciales
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

The role of predictors and cognitive conflicts on information sharing at cooperatives

Ilse María Beuren, Renata Mendes de Oliveira
article en

Abstract

This study examines the role of conflict predictors and cognitive conflicts, moderated by intra-work group affective conflicts, on information sharing at cooperatives. Structural equation modeling was applied to survey data with cooperative managers. Results demonstrate that predictors of task interdependence and mutuality among group members influence cognitive conflicts, contrasting with task types. Findings on mediation of cognitive conflicts in these relationships are similar. Moderation of cognitive conflicts in information sharing was not significant for affective conflicts. It is concluded that predictors and cognitive conflicts can be beneficial when establishing conditions to expand information sharing, which requires balance in intragroup conflicts. These results have implications mainly for managing predictors and cognitive conflicts with a view to their effectiveness in intragroup communication at cooperatives.

Estudios Gerenciales
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.