Dangerous fanaticism in Brazil (and in the world) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: There has been a global rise in denialist movements. During the COVID-19 pandemic, incorrect information about purportedly effective treatments was disseminated, notably in countries led by populist leaders, including Brazil. Objective: To analyze how scientific denial movements were consolidated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An analysis was conducted on evidence regarding the consolidation of these movements in Brazil, focusing on the role of social media groups and organized sectors. Results: In Brazil, specific segments, including parts of the medical community, were observed to support denialist movements. A resistance to science and the press was identified, accompanied by aggressive reactions against opposing views. Conclusion: The study highlights the risks associated with the consolidation of such movements in Brazil and emphasizes the need for organized societal responses to mitigate their impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ciência ET Praxis
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36704/cipraxis.v20i35.7094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dangerous fanaticism in Brazil (and in the world) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

H Silva
1 citations
Ciência ET Praxis
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Dangerous fanaticism in Brazil (and in the world) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

H Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: There has been a global rise in denialist movements. During the COVID-19 pandemic, incorrect information about purportedly effective treatments was disseminated, notably in countries led by populist leaders, including Brazil. Objective: To analyze how scientific denial movements were consolidated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An analysis was conducted on evidence regarding the consolidation of these movements in Brazil, focusing on the role of social media groups and organized sectors. Results: In Brazil, specific segments, including parts of the medical community, were observed to support denialist movements. A resistance to science and the press was identified, accompanied by aggressive reactions against opposing views. Conclusion: The study highlights the risks associated with the consolidation of such movements in Brazil and emphasizes the need for organized societal responses to mitigate their impacts.

Ciência ET PraxisVol. 20(35)
Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (BR), Centro Universitário de Formiga (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.