Longitudinal Respiratory Subphenotypes and Differences in Response to Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Fio2 Ventilation Strategy in COVID-19 ARDS
In patients with ARDS, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration remains a challenge and recommendations are not in agreement. In mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19, subphenotypes based on different respiratory trajectories have been identified, but their heterogeneity in response to PEEP/F io 2 strategy remains understudied. Can these previously determined subphenotypes be detected early in the course of mechanical ventilation, and do these subphenotypes moderate the association between PEEP and F io 2 ventilation strategy and mortality? Retrospective analysis of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19. Patients were categorized into 2 treatment groups: high PEEP/low F io 2 strategy and low PEEP/high F io 2 strategy. To replicate previously described longitudinal respiratory subphenotypes, hereafter named the low-power or high-power subphenotype, a prediction model was created. The primary outcome was the interaction between PEEP/F io 2 strategy and subphenotype, with mortality as the dependent variable. Of the 1,464 patients included in this analysis, 361 patients (25%) were allocated into the high PEEP/low F io 2 strategy and 1,103 patients (75%) were allocated into the low PEEP/high F io 2 strategy. A prediction model consisting of respiratory data of the first 2 days of invasive ventilation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.88) assigned 908 patients (62%) to the low-power subphenotype and 556 patients (38%) to the high-power subphenotype. The high-power subphenotype was characterized by higher minute volume, mechanical power, ventilatory ratio, and driving pressure. The association between PEEP/F io 2 ventilation strategy and ICU mortality was moderated by the subphenotype ( P = . 03), with high PEEP/low F io 2 ventilation being associated with lower mortality in the low-power subphenotype (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.67; P < . 001) and not in the high-power subphenotype (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57-1.28; P = . 44). In this study, high PEEP/low F io 2 ventilation was associated with improved mortality only in one of the subphenotypes, suggesting that such subphenotypes influence heterogeneity of PEEP and F io 2 effect and should be considered in personalized ventilation strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT05954351; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
Authors
- Margaretha C. E. van der Woude
- Rick van der Vliet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0764-5293)
- Sheila Nainan Myatra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6761-163X)
- Davide Filippini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-129X)
- M.J. Schultz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-9955)
- Peter E. Spronk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-8706)
- Robin L. Goossen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3355-7147)
- Markus W. Hollmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-0244)
- Laura A. Buiteman‐Kruizinga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9569-2462)
- David M. P. van Meenen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-9034)
- L.D.J. Bos
- Ary Serpa Neto
- Frederique Paulus
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN)
- Mahidol University (TH)
- Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR)
- Austin Hospital (AU)
- Gelre Hospitals (NL)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU)
- Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL)
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH)
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Monash University (AU)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- CHEST Critical Care
- Published
- 2025-03-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100145
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.04
Funders
- ZonMw