Enhancing Efficiency while Maintaining Accuracy in Repeated Coastal Drone Monitoring through the Use of Fixed Structures as Ground Control Points

Accurate coastal terrain measurement is essential for effective coastal management. While drones equipped with real-time kinematic (RTK) receivers have improved the efficiency of beach surveying, laborintensive ground control point (GCP) measurements are still required to ensure reliability. This study proposes using fixed GCPs (i.e., stable structures) to correct and validate topographic data acquired by both a conventional drone and an RTK drone and evaluates how different GCP configurations affect measurement accuracy. Experiments were conducted at Jangsa Beach using a conventional drone and Byeonsan Beach using an RTK drone. The analysis revealed a vertical discrepancy of approximately 23.5 m between ellipsoidal height and geoid height using the RTK drone. Even after geoid correction, an additional offset of about 0.125 cm persisted due to discrepancies between camera focal plane positioning and sensor alignment. However, when fixed GCPs were uniformly distributed across the beach, a DEM accuracy of around 4 cm, comparable to using only mobile GCPs, was achieved. In contrast, locally placed GCPs or configurations relying solely on mobile GCPs resulted in improved accuracy only in specific regions (e.g., the central area), while substantial errors remained in boundary regions. This issue was more pronounced with conventional drones, which have lower sensor-based positioning accuracy than RTK drones. Notably, RTK drones achieved an accuracy within 0.05 m even when using only three or more fixed GCPs, demonstrating that minimal GCP placement can still ensure reliable results. In contrast, conventional drones required denser GCP placement or additional mobile GCPs in underconstrained areas to maintain DEM accuracy. These findings confirm that integrating stable pre-surveyed structures as GCPs can significantly reduce the burden of additional GCP installation while maintaining sufficient accuracy. This approach offers a practical and efficient solution for repeated coastal monitoring, minimizing cost and time while ensuring reliable geospatial data acquisition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9765/kscoe.2025.37.1.1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Efficiency while Maintaining Accuracy in Repeated Coastal Drone Monitoring through the Use of Fixed Structures as Ground Control Points

Yong Sung Park, Byunguk Kim, Hyoseob Noh, Min-Jae Lee
Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Enhancing Efficiency while Maintaining Accuracy in Repeated Coastal Drone Monitoring through the Use of Fixed Structures as Ground Control Points

Yong Sung Park, Byunguk Kim, Hyoseob Noh, Min-Jae Lee
article en

Abstract

Accurate coastal terrain measurement is essential for effective coastal management. While drones equipped with real-time kinematic (RTK) receivers have improved the efficiency of beach surveying, laborintensive ground control point (GCP) measurements are still required to ensure reliability. This study proposes using fixed GCPs (i.e., stable structures) to correct and validate topographic data acquired by both a conventional drone and an RTK drone and evaluates how different GCP configurations affect measurement accuracy. Experiments were conducted at Jangsa Beach using a conventional drone and Byeonsan Beach using an RTK drone. The analysis revealed a vertical discrepancy of approximately 23.5 m between ellipsoidal height and geoid height using the RTK drone. Even after geoid correction, an additional offset of about 0.125 cm persisted due to discrepancies between camera focal plane positioning and sensor alignment. However, when fixed GCPs were uniformly distributed across the beach, a DEM accuracy of around 4 cm, comparable to using only mobile GCPs, was achieved. In contrast, locally placed GCPs or configurations relying solely on mobile GCPs resulted in improved accuracy only in specific regions (e.g., the central area), while substantial errors remained in boundary regions. This issue was more pronounced with conventional drones, which have lower sensor-based positioning accuracy than RTK drones. Notably, RTK drones achieved an accuracy within 0.05 m even when using only three or more fixed GCPs, demonstrating that minimal GCP placement can still ensure reliable results. In contrast, conventional drones required denser GCP placement or additional mobile GCPs in underconstrained areas to maintain DEM accuracy. These findings confirm that integrating stable pre-surveyed structures as GCPs can significantly reduce the burden of additional GCP installation while maintaining sufficient accuracy. This approach offers a practical and efficient solution for repeated coastal monitoring, minimizing cost and time while ensuring reliable geospatial data acquisition.

Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean EngineersVol. 37(1)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.