Humanity and Medicine: Responsibility, Anthropology, and Ethics

Abstract This issue introduces or reintroduces readers to a discussion of bioethics, moral responsibility, and sin. A discussion around similar topics engaged readers of this journal two decades ago, and so this issue provides an opportunity to revisit those—many now classic—papers on the subject. This issue offers diverse perspectives on ethical considerations at the nexus of three (potentially) overlapping ideas: sin, bioethics, and moral responsibility. The description of ideas is intentional, leaving open sufficient space for authors to share interpretations of how they understand each without prejudicing one conception over another. To describe bioethics as a field of inquiry that began in the late 1960s, moral responsibility is an understanding of what one might be held accountable in light of the fact that one performed or failed to perform certain actions when one possessed the ability to do otherwise, or sin as a privation of a particular kind would have yielded an undoubtedly interesting but different set of papers and a much more narrow discussion. The reader finds here four articles that comprise this issue, engaging different Christian traditions and different bioethical topics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbae017
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humanity and Medicine: Responsibility, Anthropology, and Ethics

Bryan Pilkington
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Ethics in medical practice
article

Humanity and Medicine: Responsibility, Anthropology, and Ethics

Bryan Pilkington
article en

Abstract

Abstract This issue introduces or reintroduces readers to a discussion of bioethics, moral responsibility, and sin. A discussion around similar topics engaged readers of this journal two decades ago, and so this issue provides an opportunity to revisit those—many now classic—papers on the subject. This issue offers diverse perspectives on ethical considerations at the nexus of three (potentially) overlapping ideas: sin, bioethics, and moral responsibility. The description of ideas is intentional, leaving open sufficient space for authors to share interpretations of how they understand each without prejudicing one conception over another. To describe bioethics as a field of inquiry that began in the late 1960s, moral responsibility is an understanding of what one might be held accountable in light of the fact that one performed or failed to perform certain actions when one possessed the ability to do otherwise, or sin as a privation of a particular kind would have yielded an undoubtedly interesting but different set of papers and a much more narrow discussion. The reader finds here four articles that comprise this issue, engaging different Christian traditions and different bioethical topics.

Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical MoralityVol. 31(1)
Center for Discovery (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.