Analysis of mentoring practices in science

In the context of rapid changes and uncertainty, the task of preparing students who are capable of systemic and critical thinking, solving complex problems, and quickly adapting to a changing environment becomes particularly relevant. Scientific work opens up vast opportunities for the development of such skills – not only for professional but also for personal growth. Therefore, it is essential to construct a system of scientific mentorship at universities that addresses multiple objectives: effectively ensuring the reproduction of personnel within the academic and university science system; enhancing the level of scientifi c culture in society; assisting students in the comprehensive realization of their potential. The aim of this article, presented as a case study, is to describe the experience of organizing student science and scientific mentorship at Petrozavodsk State University (PetrSU), identify the strengths and weaknesses of the existing model, and propose pathways for its transformation. The empirical foundation of the article consists of the results of a mass survey conducted among students and faculty in October 2023, which involved 1,192 students and 345 faculty members from all institutes and fi elds of study at PetrSU. The analysis of the existing model of scientifi c mentorship at PetrSU (the central element of which is the student scientifi c society) and the survey of students and faculty allowed the authors to identify the limitations of the current model. The authors also proposed a new (restructured) model that would address the contemporary challenges faced by the university, along with a comprehensive set of measures to cultivate leaders in student science within the framework of the “professor – graduate student – master’s student – senior undergraduate student – first-year student” chain. The described case of Petrozavodsk State University may be benefi cial for organizing scientific mentorship and the activities of student scientifi c societies in other higher education institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University Management Practice and Analysis
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2024.03.029
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of mentoring practices in science

Ekaterina G. Gladkikh, Anastasia V. Nikolaeva, Тетяна Кравцова, Oleg Igorevich Kulagin et al.
University Management Practice and Analysis
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Analysis of mentoring practices in science

Ekaterina G. Gladkikh, Anastasia V. Nikolaeva, Тетяна Кравцова, Oleg Igorevich Kulagin, O. S. Kazakovtseva
article en

Abstract

In the context of rapid changes and uncertainty, the task of preparing students who are capable of systemic and critical thinking, solving complex problems, and quickly adapting to a changing environment becomes particularly relevant. Scientific work opens up vast opportunities for the development of such skills – not only for professional but also for personal growth. Therefore, it is essential to construct a system of scientific mentorship at universities that addresses multiple objectives: effectively ensuring the reproduction of personnel within the academic and university science system; enhancing the level of scientifi c culture in society; assisting students in the comprehensive realization of their potential. The aim of this article, presented as a case study, is to describe the experience of organizing student science and scientific mentorship at Petrozavodsk State University (PetrSU), identify the strengths and weaknesses of the existing model, and propose pathways for its transformation. The empirical foundation of the article consists of the results of a mass survey conducted among students and faculty in October 2023, which involved 1,192 students and 345 faculty members from all institutes and fi elds of study at PetrSU. The analysis of the existing model of scientifi c mentorship at PetrSU (the central element of which is the student scientifi c society) and the survey of students and faculty allowed the authors to identify the limitations of the current model. The authors also proposed a new (restructured) model that would address the contemporary challenges faced by the university, along with a comprehensive set of measures to cultivate leaders in student science within the framework of the “professor – graduate student – master’s student – senior undergraduate student – first-year student” chain. The described case of Petrozavodsk State University may be benefi cial for organizing scientific mentorship and the activities of student scientifi c societies in other higher education institutions.

University Management Practice and AnalysisVol. 28(3)
Petrozavodsk State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.