Relativization of Principle Application: Weak Establishment of Legal Regulations and the Relevance of Decisions of the Constitutional Court

In the process of regulatory and law-making that become legislative authorities, no longer pays attention to the principles of law in the process so that it has implications for judicial review application at the Constitutional Court. This research is focused on; 1) The process of implementation and consideration of regulatory and law-making by the legislative. 2) the relativization of law’s principle has implications for the results of judicial review by the Constitutional Court. The research methods used are normative research with a statutes approach, and a conceptual approach, and are analyzed using historical, systematic, and hermenetic interpretations to draw results and conclusions. The results showed that in the process of formil and materiil in the process of regulatory and law-making tends to ignore the principle of law as a fundamental aspect. This has an impact on increasing judicial review application by the Constitutional Court, especially on the Fiduciary Guarantee law and the Job copyright Law which affirms the abandonment of law’s principles in substance and process so as to affect the enforceability of the law in the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RESPONSIVE LAW JOURNAL
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59923/rlj.v1i2.253
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relativization of Principle Application: Weak Establishment of Legal Regulations and the Relevance of Decisions of the Constitutional Court

Inna Fauziatal Ngazizah, Taufik Taufik
1 citations
RESPONSIVE LAW JOURNAL
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
4.07
article

Relativization of Principle Application: Weak Establishment of Legal Regulations and the Relevance of Decisions of the Constitutional Court

Inna Fauziatal Ngazizah, Taufik Taufik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the process of regulatory and law-making that become legislative authorities, no longer pays attention to the principles of law in the process so that it has implications for judicial review application at the Constitutional Court. This research is focused on; 1) The process of implementation and consideration of regulatory and law-making by the legislative. 2) the relativization of law’s principle has implications for the results of judicial review by the Constitutional Court. The research methods used are normative research with a statutes approach, and a conceptual approach, and are analyzed using historical, systematic, and hermenetic interpretations to draw results and conclusions. The results showed that in the process of formil and materiil in the process of regulatory and law-making tends to ignore the principle of law as a fundamental aspect. This has an impact on increasing judicial review application by the Constitutional Court, especially on the Fiduciary Guarantee law and the Job copyright Law which affirms the abandonment of law’s principles in substance and process so as to affect the enforceability of the law in the community.

RESPONSIVE LAW JOURNALVol. 1(2)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan (ID), IAIN Kudus (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.