Eye lens dose survey for medical staff in interventional cardiology: preliminary results

In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended reducing the occupational dose limit for eye lens, Heye lens, from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. Many countries, including Vietnam, have incorporated the new recommended dose limits into their radiation safety regulations. This study aims to evaluate radiation dose to the eyes of cardiovascular interventional radiology staff in one hospital to assess whether the new dose limits are likely to be exceeded in the unit. At the same time, determine the suitability of using personal dosimeters to estimate eye lens dose. The eye lens doses for 12 cardiovascular interventional staff were measured using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) nanoDot type over a period of 10 weeks. At the same time, readings of OSLDs Inlight type (personal dosimeters) were used to estimate the eye lens dose. The eye lens doses estimated by the two methods were then compared. The annual eye lens doses for eight doctors ranged from 2.40±0.44 mSv to 19.10±3.53 mSv. Meanwhile, the doses for four technicians were significantly below the limit, with the highest annual eye lens dose recorded at 4.20±0.78 mSv. The results from personal dosimeters overestimated the eye lens dose by up to 31%. The new eye lens dose limit is highly likely to be exceeded. Relying on personal dosimeter to estimate eye lens dose may lead to overestimation. Protective measures should be implemented to ensure the long-term health and safety of interventional radiology staff.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Y HOC TP HO CHI MINH
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32895/ump.mpr.9.1.4
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye lens dose survey for medical staff in interventional cardiology: preliminary results

Trung-Dung Hoang, Lena Dang, N. Nguyen, Tuyen Nhu Pham et al.
Y HOC TP HO CHI MINH
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Eye lens dose survey for medical staff in interventional cardiology: preliminary results

Trung-Dung Hoang, Lena Dang, N. Nguyen, Tuyen Nhu Pham, Ngoc Minh Tran
article en

Abstract

In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended reducing the occupational dose limit for eye lens, Heye lens, from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. Many countries, including Vietnam, have incorporated the new recommended dose limits into their radiation safety regulations. This study aims to evaluate radiation dose to the eyes of cardiovascular interventional radiology staff in one hospital to assess whether the new dose limits are likely to be exceeded in the unit. At the same time, determine the suitability of using personal dosimeters to estimate eye lens dose. The eye lens doses for 12 cardiovascular interventional staff were measured using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) nanoDot type over a period of 10 weeks. At the same time, readings of OSLDs Inlight type (personal dosimeters) were used to estimate the eye lens dose. The eye lens doses estimated by the two methods were then compared. The annual eye lens doses for eight doctors ranged from 2.40±0.44 mSv to 19.10±3.53 mSv. Meanwhile, the doses for four technicians were significantly below the limit, with the highest annual eye lens dose recorded at 4.20±0.78 mSv. The results from personal dosimeters overestimated the eye lens dose by up to 31%. The new eye lens dose limit is highly likely to be exceeded. Relying on personal dosimeter to estimate eye lens dose may lead to overestimation. Protective measures should be implemented to ensure the long-term health and safety of interventional radiology staff.

Y HOC TP HO CHI MINHVol. 9(1)
Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.