Multi-Site evaluation of a novel point-of-care 3D printing quality assurance protocol for a material jetting 3D printer

This study demonstrates that this novel protocol is both feasible and reliable for quality assurance in POC 3D printing across multiple sites. This protocol offers an adaptable framework that allows users to tailor the QA process to their specific needs. Through the comprehensive method, users can measure and identify all relevant factors that might introduce error into their printed product and then follow the most critical aspects for their situation across every print. The QA cubes produced via this protocol can provide guidance on print quality and alert users to unsatisfactory machine operation which could cause prints to fall outside of engineering and clinical tolerances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
3D Printing in Medicine
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00259-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Site evaluation of a novel point-of-care 3D printing quality assurance protocol for a material jetting 3D printer

Kyle K. VanKoevering, Megan M. Malara, Dylan T. Beckler, Matthew Marquardt et al.
1 citations
3D Printing in Medicine
Anatomy and Medical Technology
0.67
article

Multi-Site evaluation of a novel point-of-care 3D printing quality assurance protocol for a material jetting 3D printer

Kyle K. VanKoevering, Megan M. Malara, Dylan T. Beckler, Matthew Marquardt, Trevor A. Snyder, Zachary C. Thumser, Nicholas Beemster, William Corcuera
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study demonstrates that this novel protocol is both feasible and reliable for quality assurance in POC 3D printing across multiple sites. This protocol offers an adaptable framework that allows users to tailor the QA process to their specific needs. Through the comprehensive method, users can measure and identify all relevant factors that might introduce error into their printed product and then follow the most critical aspects for their situation across every print. The QA cubes produced via this protocol can provide guidance on print quality and alert users to unsatisfactory machine operation which could cause prints to fall outside of engineering and clinical tolerances.

3D Printing in MedicineVol. 11(1)
Cleveland State University (US), Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-Site evaluation of a novel point-of-care 3D printing quality assurance protocol for a material jetting 3D printer — Kyle K. VanKoevering, Megan M. Malara, et al. · 3D Printing in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS