Industrial heritage and urban renewal: a quantitative study and optimization strategies for Chengdu East Suburb Memory

Introduction The acceleration of urbanization and industrial restructuring in recent years has positioned the regeneration of industrial heritage as a critical issue in urban renewal and sustainable development. However, existing research predominantly focuses on design and conservation, lacking systematic quantitative analysis of user satisfaction, which limits holistic optimization of regeneration outcomes. Methods This study employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) to quantitatively evaluate user satisfaction. A satisfaction evaluation system was constructed across six dimensions—cultural identity, environmental sustainability, social impact, technology application, spatial layout, and economic value—and empirically validated through questionnaire surveys and statistical analysis. Results The SEM analysis revealed that social impact exerts the strongest influence on user satisfaction, emphasizing the role of community interaction and public participation. Economic value and environmental sustainability ranked second, highlighting the significance of economic benefits and ecological improvements. Cultural identity and spatial layout showed weaker effects, suggesting insufficient integration of cultural and technological elements. IPA further identified key areas for improvement, such as intelligent management systems and transportation convenience. Discussion The findings underscore the necessity of prioritizing community engagement and economic-environmental synergies in industrial heritage regeneration. While cultural and spatial factors require deeper integration, technological innovations should be leveraged to enhance functional performance. These insights provide policymakers and urban planners with actionable strategies to balance social, economic, and cultural benefits, advancing sustainable urban development goals. The study bridges the gap between qualitative preservation and quantitative user-centric evaluation, offering a replicable framework for future heritage regeneration projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1537211
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial heritage and urban renewal: a quantitative study and optimization strategies for Chengdu East Suburb Memory

Jun Xia, S. F. Wang, Cheng Ai
8 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
66.18
article

Industrial heritage and urban renewal: a quantitative study and optimization strategies for Chengdu East Suburb Memory

Jun Xia, S. F. Wang, Cheng Ai
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Introduction The acceleration of urbanization and industrial restructuring in recent years has positioned the regeneration of industrial heritage as a critical issue in urban renewal and sustainable development. However, existing research predominantly focuses on design and conservation, lacking systematic quantitative analysis of user satisfaction, which limits holistic optimization of regeneration outcomes. Methods This study employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) to quantitatively evaluate user satisfaction. A satisfaction evaluation system was constructed across six dimensions—cultural identity, environmental sustainability, social impact, technology application, spatial layout, and economic value—and empirically validated through questionnaire surveys and statistical analysis. Results The SEM analysis revealed that social impact exerts the strongest influence on user satisfaction, emphasizing the role of community interaction and public participation. Economic value and environmental sustainability ranked second, highlighting the significance of economic benefits and ecological improvements. Cultural identity and spatial layout showed weaker effects, suggesting insufficient integration of cultural and technological elements. IPA further identified key areas for improvement, such as intelligent management systems and transportation convenience. Discussion The findings underscore the necessity of prioritizing community engagement and economic-environmental synergies in industrial heritage regeneration. While cultural and spatial factors require deeper integration, technological innovations should be leveraged to enhance functional performance. These insights provide policymakers and urban planners with actionable strategies to balance social, economic, and cultural benefits, advancing sustainable urban development goals. The study bridges the gap between qualitative preservation and quantitative user-centric evaluation, offering a replicable framework for future heritage regeneration projects.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
Dongseo University (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
66.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.