A Comparison of Different Interaction Modes for Measuring Simple and Peripheral Reaction Times

The objective of this work is to assess whether the voice interaction mode can replace the button in simple reaction time (SRT) and peripheral reaction time (PRT) tests. To achieve the above, we have carried out a first study with 26 young subjects to whom these tests were applied with both modes of interaction, that is, they used the four conditions: SRT-button, SRT-voice, PRT-button, and SRT-voice. We found that reaction time means are greater than the button conditions. We conclude that modifying the tests (SRT or PRT) to include voice as a reaction mode resulted in a more cognitively demanding reaction test. This work contributes to Human-Computer Interaction because it demonstrates the feasibility of using an interaction mode different from that typically used in reaction time tests, which would allow studies to be carried out to measure reaction time in other contexts, such as people with disabilities, or mobility issues.Interaction modes

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Avances en Interacción Humano-Computadora
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47756/aihc.y9i1.177
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Different Interaction Modes for Measuring Simple and Peripheral Reaction Times

Marcela D. Rodríguez, René Yahir Rodríguez Robledo, Ernesto Miguel Vera Uribe, Carlos Aguilar-Avelar
Avances en Interacción Humano-Computadora
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

A Comparison of Different Interaction Modes for Measuring Simple and Peripheral Reaction Times

Marcela D. Rodríguez, René Yahir Rodríguez Robledo, Ernesto Miguel Vera Uribe, Carlos Aguilar-Avelar
article en

Abstract

The objective of this work is to assess whether the voice interaction mode can replace the button in simple reaction time (SRT) and peripheral reaction time (PRT) tests. To achieve the above, we have carried out a first study with 26 young subjects to whom these tests were applied with both modes of interaction, that is, they used the four conditions: SRT-button, SRT-voice, PRT-button, and SRT-voice. We found that reaction time means are greater than the button conditions. We conclude that modifying the tests (SRT or PRT) to include voice as a reaction mode resulted in a more cognitively demanding reaction test. This work contributes to Human-Computer Interaction because it demonstrates the feasibility of using an interaction mode different from that typically used in reaction time tests, which would allow studies to be carried out to measure reaction time in other contexts, such as people with disabilities, or mobility issues.Interaction modes

Avances en Interacción Humano-ComputadoraVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.