Toward Legal, Ethical, and Culturally Informed Care of Animal Remains in American Museum Collections
Abstract Repatriation of human remains and associated funerary objects under NAGPRA and the increased use of culturally informed curation practices for sacred, religious, and ceremonial objects are important steps toward restoring control over cultural patrimony to Native Nations in the United States. Many museums holding Indigenous belongings have begun a collaborative care approach involving Indigenous community voices and improving access to collections. However, this framework has not been applied to many animal remains curated in American archaeology museums, which remain broadly beyond the care or administrative purview of Native people. Because many Indigenous worldviews do not hold a clear separation between the human and animal spheres, common practices applied to animal remains are not congruent with the idea of respectful or culturally informed care. Here we outline steps to shift the treatment of animals through the application of Indigenous knowledge to museum collections.
Authors
- Christina Cain
- Jimmy Arterberry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1849-1533)
- Natalie Patton
- Joseph Aguilar
- William Taylor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-7814)
- Emily Lena Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-7469)
- Chance Ward
Institutions
- University of New Mexico (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Cherokee Nation (US)
- Heritage Preservation (US)
- Museum of Boulder (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advances in Archaeological Practice
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2024.25
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.59