Toward Legal, Ethical, and Culturally Informed Care of Animal Remains in American Museum Collections

Abstract Repatriation of human remains and associated funerary objects under NAGPRA and the increased use of culturally informed curation practices for sacred, religious, and ceremonial objects are important steps toward restoring control over cultural patrimony to Native Nations in the United States. Many museums holding Indigenous belongings have begun a collaborative care approach involving Indigenous community voices and improving access to collections. However, this framework has not been applied to many animal remains curated in American archaeology museums, which remain broadly beyond the care or administrative purview of Native people. Because many Indigenous worldviews do not hold a clear separation between the human and animal spheres, common practices applied to animal remains are not congruent with the idea of respectful or culturally informed care. Here we outline steps to shift the treatment of animals through the application of Indigenous knowledge to museum collections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2024.25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Legal, Ethical, and Culturally Informed Care of Animal Remains in American Museum Collections

Christina Cain, Jimmy Arterberry, Natalie Patton, Joseph Aguilar et al.
1 citations
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
1.59
article

Toward Legal, Ethical, and Culturally Informed Care of Animal Remains in American Museum Collections

Christina Cain, Jimmy Arterberry, Natalie Patton, Joseph Aguilar, William Taylor, Emily Lena Jones, Chance Ward
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Repatriation of human remains and associated funerary objects under NAGPRA and the increased use of culturally informed curation practices for sacred, religious, and ceremonial objects are important steps toward restoring control over cultural patrimony to Native Nations in the United States. Many museums holding Indigenous belongings have begun a collaborative care approach involving Indigenous community voices and improving access to collections. However, this framework has not been applied to many animal remains curated in American archaeology museums, which remain broadly beyond the care or administrative purview of Native people. Because many Indigenous worldviews do not hold a clear separation between the human and animal spheres, common practices applied to animal remains are not congruent with the idea of respectful or culturally informed care. Here we outline steps to shift the treatment of animals through the application of Indigenous knowledge to museum collections.

Advances in Archaeological PracticeVol. 12(4)
University of New Mexico (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Cherokee Nation (US), Heritage Preservation (US), Museum of Boulder (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward Legal, Ethical, and Culturally Informed Care of Animal Remains in American Museum Collections — Christina Cain, Jimmy Arterberry, et al. · Advances in Archaeological Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS