Maximizing conventional oil recovery and carbon mitigation: an artificial intelligence-driven assessment and optimization of carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery with physics-based dimensionless type curves

Introduction Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR) is a well-established technology that has been deployed for over 2 decades, primarily to boost oil recovery rates. Recently, however, CO 2 -EOR has gained attention as a potential carbon mitigation strategy, given its ability to both enhance oil recovery without requiring extensive new drilling and store CO 2 in subsurface formations. This dual function aligns with net-zero carbon goals, as CO 2 is partly trapped in the reservoir through solubility and hysteresis effects on relative permeability. The performance of CO 2 -EOR, in terms of both oil recovery and CO 2 storage potential, depends on numerous factors, including reservoir properties such as porosity, permeability, thickness, fluid composition, and operating conditions like bottom-hole pressure and injection rates. Traditional screening for CO 2 -EOR candidate reservoirs typically relies on experimental work, simulation studies, and field analogs, all of which require significant time and resources. However, a large dataset exists from prior CO 2 -EOR projects, which could enable more efficient screening. Methods To leverage this data and capitalize on recent advancements in artificial intelligence, we developed an integrated methodology to predict CO 2 -EOR production profiles rapidly and accurately. Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), we trained a proxy model (PM) with over 2,000 simulation cases based on real-world CO 2 -EOR projects. The model’s novelty lies in its ability to generate dimensionless type curves and their derivatives, which can be matched with production data to estimate average reservoir characteristics at later project stages. Results and Discussions Our results demonstrate that the proxy model achieves a high level of accuracy, with a maximum Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.012 and a correlation coefficient of 0.99 between predicted and simulated results across three output variables. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis revealed the significant influence of parameters such as fluid composition, rock-fluid interaction, porosity, permeability, and initial reservoir pressure on CO 2 -EOR production profiles. This approach provides a rapid, cost-effective alternative to conventional methods, allowing for quicker and more informed decision-making in CO 2 -EOR projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Energy Research
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1478473
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximizing conventional oil recovery and carbon mitigation: an artificial intelligence-driven assessment and optimization of carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery with physics-based dimensionless type curves

Amirmasoud Kalantari Dahaghi, Raghda Emera
Frontiers in Energy Research
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Maximizing conventional oil recovery and carbon mitigation: an artificial intelligence-driven assessment and optimization of carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery with physics-based dimensionless type curves

Amirmasoud Kalantari Dahaghi, Raghda Emera
article en

Abstract

Introduction Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR) is a well-established technology that has been deployed for over 2 decades, primarily to boost oil recovery rates. Recently, however, CO 2 -EOR has gained attention as a potential carbon mitigation strategy, given its ability to both enhance oil recovery without requiring extensive new drilling and store CO 2 in subsurface formations. This dual function aligns with net-zero carbon goals, as CO 2 is partly trapped in the reservoir through solubility and hysteresis effects on relative permeability. The performance of CO 2 -EOR, in terms of both oil recovery and CO 2 storage potential, depends on numerous factors, including reservoir properties such as porosity, permeability, thickness, fluid composition, and operating conditions like bottom-hole pressure and injection rates. Traditional screening for CO 2 -EOR candidate reservoirs typically relies on experimental work, simulation studies, and field analogs, all of which require significant time and resources. However, a large dataset exists from prior CO 2 -EOR projects, which could enable more efficient screening. Methods To leverage this data and capitalize on recent advancements in artificial intelligence, we developed an integrated methodology to predict CO 2 -EOR production profiles rapidly and accurately. Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), we trained a proxy model (PM) with over 2,000 simulation cases based on real-world CO 2 -EOR projects. The model’s novelty lies in its ability to generate dimensionless type curves and their derivatives, which can be matched with production data to estimate average reservoir characteristics at later project stages. Results and Discussions Our results demonstrate that the proxy model achieves a high level of accuracy, with a maximum Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.012 and a correlation coefficient of 0.99 between predicted and simulated results across three output variables. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis revealed the significant influence of parameters such as fluid composition, rock-fluid interaction, porosity, permeability, and initial reservoir pressure on CO 2 -EOR production profiles. This approach provides a rapid, cost-effective alternative to conventional methods, allowing for quicker and more informed decision-making in CO 2 -EOR projects.

Frontiers in Energy ResearchVol. 13
University of Kansas (US), University of Petroleum (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.