Predicting Pilot Workloads Using Physiological Measures

In this study, we utilized machine learning algorithms to predict pilot workload based on physiological, cognitive, and eye-tracking data collected from 7 pilots performing tasks in an unclassified F-35 flight simulator. We used the Bedford Workload Rating Scale (BWRS) to validate the high workload conditions induced during the simulated flight scenarios. We then trained models and compared their performance at predicting high workloads. Our results showed model performance was higher when classifiers were trained on individual pilots instead of on a group of pilots. We found that changes in Percent Change Pupil Size (PCPS), an eye-tracking measurement, were particularly noticeable in high vs. low-workload scenarios. This metric emerged as the most significant factor in distinctly difficult situations. These findings suggest a shift towards personalized machine-learning models for enhancing human-machine interactions in aviation through biometric and PCPS monitoring. Future work should examine a more diverse set of tasks, validated by study subjects, to assess the potential benefits of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) assistance systems into the cockpit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Systems Engineering Review
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37266/iser.2025v12i1.pp1-6
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Pilot Workloads Using Physiological Measures

Valor Carlsen, Roger Manzi, Simon Dellinger, Tanner Craig et al.
Industrial and Systems Engineering Review
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

Predicting Pilot Workloads Using Physiological Measures

Valor Carlsen, Roger Manzi, Simon Dellinger, Tanner Craig, Donald Koban
article en

Abstract

In this study, we utilized machine learning algorithms to predict pilot workload based on physiological, cognitive, and eye-tracking data collected from 7 pilots performing tasks in an unclassified F-35 flight simulator. We used the Bedford Workload Rating Scale (BWRS) to validate the high workload conditions induced during the simulated flight scenarios. We then trained models and compared their performance at predicting high workloads. Our results showed model performance was higher when classifiers were trained on individual pilots instead of on a group of pilots. We found that changes in Percent Change Pupil Size (PCPS), an eye-tracking measurement, were particularly noticeable in high vs. low-workload scenarios. This metric emerged as the most significant factor in distinctly difficult situations. These findings suggest a shift towards personalized machine-learning models for enhancing human-machine interactions in aviation through biometric and PCPS monitoring. Future work should examine a more diverse set of tasks, validated by study subjects, to assess the potential benefits of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) assistance systems into the cockpit.

Industrial and Systems Engineering ReviewVol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.