The dual job dilemma: Exploring the arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ moonlighting and the current scenario in India

Background: Is moonlighting truly harmful, or is it simply misunderstood?This question invites a deeper exploration into the complexities surrounding the practice of holding a second job alongside one's primary employment.Flipkart was founded by Sachin and Binny Bansal while they were working at Amazon.Nasdaq-listed Freshworks was founded by Girish Mathrubootham, while he was still at SaaS rival Zoho.Thus, the practice of moonlighting is not new, history is filled with successful examples of individuals who took on additional work to pursue their entrepreneurial dreams.Moonlighting, by definition, involves taking on additional work outside of regular working hours, often done discreetly to avoid conflicts or repercussions from the primary employer.Although moonlighting itself may not be inherently problematic, the secrecy surrounding it can erode trust, create potential legal and ethical dilemmas, and negatively affect job performance and professional relationships.Results: This paper is a conceptual exploration that delves into the multifaceted debate on moonlighting, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of its concept, types, and the arguments for and against the practice.In addition, this paper also advocates for its recognition as legitimate in India.For moonlighting to truly benefit all stakeholders, there is a need for greater transparency and a well-defined legal framework.By establishing clear guidelines that allow employees to engage in moonlighting within certain boundaries, India can ensure that both the interests of employers and the autonomy of employees are protected.However, the legal and regulatory framework in India remains ambiguous on the subject, often leaving both employees and employers uncertain about their rights and responsibilities.Conclusion: This paper emphasizes the need for formal recognition and regulation of moonlighting to maximize its benefits for all stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Research and Analysis
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2025.006
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dual job dilemma: Exploring the arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ moonlighting and the current scenario in India

Akanksha Jain
Journal of Management Research and Analysis
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

The dual job dilemma: Exploring the arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ moonlighting and the current scenario in India

Akanksha Jain
article en

Abstract

Background: Is moonlighting truly harmful, or is it simply misunderstood?This question invites a deeper exploration into the complexities surrounding the practice of holding a second job alongside one's primary employment.Flipkart was founded by Sachin and Binny Bansal while they were working at Amazon.Nasdaq-listed Freshworks was founded by Girish Mathrubootham, while he was still at SaaS rival Zoho.Thus, the practice of moonlighting is not new, history is filled with successful examples of individuals who took on additional work to pursue their entrepreneurial dreams.Moonlighting, by definition, involves taking on additional work outside of regular working hours, often done discreetly to avoid conflicts or repercussions from the primary employer.Although moonlighting itself may not be inherently problematic, the secrecy surrounding it can erode trust, create potential legal and ethical dilemmas, and negatively affect job performance and professional relationships.Results: This paper is a conceptual exploration that delves into the multifaceted debate on moonlighting, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of its concept, types, and the arguments for and against the practice.In addition, this paper also advocates for its recognition as legitimate in India.For moonlighting to truly benefit all stakeholders, there is a need for greater transparency and a well-defined legal framework.By establishing clear guidelines that allow employees to engage in moonlighting within certain boundaries, India can ensure that both the interests of employers and the autonomy of employees are protected.However, the legal and regulatory framework in India remains ambiguous on the subject, often leaving both employees and employers uncertain about their rights and responsibilities.Conclusion: This paper emphasizes the need for formal recognition and regulation of moonlighting to maximize its benefits for all stakeholders.

Journal of Management Research and AnalysisVol. 12(1)
University of Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.