Rules, Behaviors, Sanctions. Means of Manifestation of Juridical Authority in Moldavia in the First Decades of the 19th century

The article analyses the judicial practice in medieval and pre-modern Moldavia, with a special focus on the ways in which the ruler, as a supreme judicial authority, created the mechanism of social control through law. Eventually, justice was called to regulate the behaviours that did not pay attention to the rules (customs, norms) by which the Moldavian society of the period was governed. Although the princely institution lost its previous prestige due to the Phanariot regime, the ruler preserved his status as the supreme juridical authority of the realm. However, during the 19th century, the death sentence became increasingly rare, probably due to the injunction of the Porte. The means of manifestation of the princely power in Moldavia, as it emerges from the research of the sources of the first three decades of the 19th century, derive from the very authority of the ruler. The prince used all the means, including the symbolic ones, in an attempt to impose the social control. From this perspective, respect for the law was an essential tool, supported by a judicial apparatus composed of dignitaries and servants with limited executive and judicial powers.

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Istorică
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59277/ri.2024.4-6.35.05
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rules, Behaviors, Sanctions. Means of Manifestation of Juridical Authority in Moldavia in the First Decades of the 19th century

Revista Istorică
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Rules, Behaviors, Sanctions. Means of Manifestation of Juridical Authority in Moldavia in the First Decades of the 19th century

article en

Abstract

The article analyses the judicial practice in medieval and pre-modern Moldavia, with a special focus on the ways in which the ruler, as a supreme judicial authority, created the mechanism of social control through law. Eventually, justice was called to regulate the behaviours that did not pay attention to the rules (customs, norms) by which the Moldavian society of the period was governed. Although the princely institution lost its previous prestige due to the Phanariot regime, the ruler preserved his status as the supreme juridical authority of the realm. However, during the 19th century, the death sentence became increasingly rare, probably due to the injunction of the Porte. The means of manifestation of the princely power in Moldavia, as it emerges from the research of the sources of the first three decades of the 19th century, derive from the very authority of the ruler. The prince used all the means, including the symbolic ones, in an attempt to impose the social control. From this perspective, respect for the law was an essential tool, supported by a judicial apparatus composed of dignitaries and servants with limited executive and judicial powers.

Revista IstoricăVol. 35(4-6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.