Response to João Carlos Major’s Reflective Essay on Carl Jung and the Evolutionary Sciences: A New Vision for Analytical Psychology

Abstract In this essay I reply to João Carlos Major’s “Reflective Essay on Gary Clark’s book, Carl Jung and the Evolutionary Sciences: A New Vision for Analytical Psychology .” In his essay João offers a thoughtful appreciation of my attempt to ground analytical psychology in the evolutionary sciences. I explore areas of agreement such as a shared concern regarding the rejection of the scientific aspect of Jung’s thinking by numerous post-Jungian scholars. I then address João’s criticism of my advocacy of psychedelic neuroscience and its relevance to analytical psychology. While disagreeing with João on numerous points, I argue his critique provides important nuance as to how the scientific enterprise driven by consciousness can be strengthened and maintained while at the same time integrating unconscious material into conscious awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Jungian Studies
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-bja10048
Primary Topic
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response to João Carlos Major’s Reflective Essay on Carl Jung and the Evolutionary Sciences: A New Vision for Analytical Psychology

Gary Clark
1 links
International Journal of Jungian Studies
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
article

Response to João Carlos Major’s Reflective Essay on Carl Jung and the Evolutionary Sciences: A New Vision for Analytical Psychology

Gary Clark
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this essay I reply to João Carlos Major’s “Reflective Essay on Gary Clark’s book, Carl Jung and the Evolutionary Sciences: A New Vision for Analytical Psychology .” In his essay João offers a thoughtful appreciation of my attempt to ground analytical psychology in the evolutionary sciences. I explore areas of agreement such as a shared concern regarding the rejection of the scientific aspect of Jung’s thinking by numerous post-Jungian scholars. I then address João’s criticism of my advocacy of psychedelic neuroscience and its relevance to analytical psychology. While disagreeing with João on numerous points, I argue his critique provides important nuance as to how the scientific enterprise driven by consciousness can be strengthened and maintained while at the same time integrating unconscious material into conscious awareness.

International Journal of Jungian StudiesVol. 17(2)
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.