The Association Between Sex and Lung Cancer Screening Adherence to Follow-Up in a Cohort of Veterans

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The 2021 update to the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer screening (LCS) aims to reduce disparities derived from sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Few studies have addressed adherence to LCS among female Veterans. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To evaluate differences in adherence to LCS by sex, we conducted a retrospective cohort study within the VA Connecticut LCS Program between June 2013 and March 2020. Our primary outcome was nonadherence, defined as lack of completion of a chest CT scan within the guideline recommended interval plus a 90-day grace period. Eligible patients were enrolled in the screening program and had a baseline Lung-RADS score of 1, 2, or 3. Patients with Lung-Reporting and Data System (RADS) 4 were excluded due to variability in follow-up recommendations. We adjusted for age, race, smoking history, mental/medical comorbidities, and primary care (PC) visits (1-year after first/index CT). Logistic regression modeling was used to determine associations between sex and nonadherence overall and stratified by Lung-RADS 1-2 and Lung-RADS 3. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 4,711 Veterans, the overall rate of nonadherence was 34%. Female Veterans were 66% more likely nonadherent to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-2.30) compared with male Veterans. Substance use disorder was associated with greater nonadherence (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.01-1.47). Lower nonadherence was observed among patients with COPD (OR = 0.77, CI = 0.66-0.9) and PC engagement (OR for nonadherence with 5 or more PC visits = 0.78, CI = 0.67-0.91). The associations between sex and nonadherence were similar in models stratified by Lung-RADS groups 1-2, although did not reach significance for the Lung-RADS 3 group. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> In this cohort, female Veterans were more likely nonadherent. More work is needed to understand the distinct barriers to LCS follow-up among female Veterans. Health care system engagement significantly reduced nonadherence, which may partially explain higher rates of nonadherence among female Veterans who had fewer medical comorbidities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women s Health
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0780
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association Between Sex and Lung Cancer Screening Adherence to Follow-Up in a Cohort of Veterans

Hilary Cain, Kathleen M. Akgün, Jeffrey D. Kravetz, Rached Zeghlache et al.
2 citations
Journal of Women s Health
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
3.04
article

The Association Between Sex and Lung Cancer Screening Adherence to Follow-Up in a Cohort of Veterans

Hilary Cain, Kathleen M. Akgün, Jeffrey D. Kravetz, Rached Zeghlache, Ethan Bernstein, Brett C. Bade, Kathryn Lerz, Eric DeRycke, Lori A. Bastian, Melissa M. Farmer, Michal G. Rose
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The 2021 update to the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer screening (LCS) aims to reduce disparities derived from sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Few studies have addressed adherence to LCS among female Veterans. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To evaluate differences in adherence to LCS by sex, we conducted a retrospective cohort study within the VA Connecticut LCS Program between June 2013 and March 2020. Our primary outcome was nonadherence, defined as lack of completion of a chest CT scan within the guideline recommended interval plus a 90-day grace period. Eligible patients were enrolled in the screening program and had a baseline Lung-RADS score of 1, 2, or 3. Patients with Lung-Reporting and Data System (RADS) 4 were excluded due to variability in follow-up recommendations. We adjusted for age, race, smoking history, mental/medical comorbidities, and primary care (PC) visits (1-year after first/index CT). Logistic regression modeling was used to determine associations between sex and nonadherence overall and stratified by Lung-RADS 1-2 and Lung-RADS 3. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 4,711 Veterans, the overall rate of nonadherence was 34%. Female Veterans were 66% more likely nonadherent to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-2.30) compared with male Veterans. Substance use disorder was associated with greater nonadherence (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.01-1.47). Lower nonadherence was observed among patients with COPD (OR = 0.77, CI = 0.66-0.9) and PC engagement (OR for nonadherence with 5 or more PC visits = 0.78, CI = 0.67-0.91). The associations between sex and nonadherence were similar in models stratified by Lung-RADS groups 1-2, although did not reach significance for the Lung-RADS 3 group. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> In this cohort, female Veterans were more likely nonadherent. More work is needed to understand the distinct barriers to LCS follow-up among female Veterans. Health care system engagement significantly reduced nonadherence, which may partially explain higher rates of nonadherence among female Veterans who had fewer medical comorbidities.

Journal of Women s HealthVol. 34(5)
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), University of Connecticut (US), Lenox Hill Hospital (US), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US), Waterbury Hospital (US), UConn Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.