Adversatives and Concessives: Argumentation and Intersubjectivity

Abstract: The paper discusses the interpretation of adversative clauses introduced by pero and concessive clauses introduced by aunque in Spanish. Specifically, the discussion centers around structures that exhibit the forms: (i) A, pero B , (ii) A, aunque B-INDICATIVE , and (iii) A, aunque B-SUBJUNCTIVE . In these types of constructions, A and B reflect contrasting cognitive realities or subjectivities. The paper examines the different prominence given to the argumentative and intersubjective component associated with pero and aunque in these constructions. It is shown that whereas (i) favors inferences associated with B and (iii) favors inferences associated with A, (ii) gives equal weight to both perspectives, not privileging the speaker’s perspective as presented in A. In construction (ii), the meaning of aunque gravitates towards its intersubjective component, while it mitigates its argumentative component, as, rather than lead the audience to conclusions associated with either A or B, the speaker is giving equal prominence to both contrasting views. This in turn makes the construction in (ii) best suited for the expression of courtesy or deference. Since the construction illustrated in (ii) arises later in the history of Spanish, the paper points to a possible process of intersubjectification of aunque .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hispania
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2025.a953556
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adversatives and Concessives: Argumentation and Intersubjectivity

Errapel Mejías‐Bikandi
Hispania
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Adversatives and Concessives: Argumentation and Intersubjectivity

Errapel Mejías‐Bikandi
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The paper discusses the interpretation of adversative clauses introduced by pero and concessive clauses introduced by aunque in Spanish. Specifically, the discussion centers around structures that exhibit the forms: (i) A, pero B , (ii) A, aunque B-INDICATIVE , and (iii) A, aunque B-SUBJUNCTIVE . In these types of constructions, A and B reflect contrasting cognitive realities or subjectivities. The paper examines the different prominence given to the argumentative and intersubjective component associated with pero and aunque in these constructions. It is shown that whereas (i) favors inferences associated with B and (iii) favors inferences associated with A, (ii) gives equal weight to both perspectives, not privileging the speaker’s perspective as presented in A. In construction (ii), the meaning of aunque gravitates towards its intersubjective component, while it mitigates its argumentative component, as, rather than lead the audience to conclusions associated with either A or B, the speaker is giving equal prominence to both contrasting views. This in turn makes the construction in (ii) best suited for the expression of courtesy or deference. Since the construction illustrated in (ii) arises later in the history of Spanish, the paper points to a possible process of intersubjectification of aunque .

HispaniaVol. 108(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adversatives and Concessives: Argumentation and Intersubjectivity — Errapel Mejías‐Bikandi · Hispania (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS