Assessing and ranking the skills required for IT personnel: a hybrid decision-making model using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS

Purpose The hiring process for information technology (IT) personnel, given its high stakes and intricacies, demands an objective, methodical and nuanced approach. The multifaceted nature of IT roles necessitates a comprehensive evaluation methodology to identify and prioritize pertinent skills and competencies. Therefore, this study aims to devise and implement a robust multi-criteria decision-making model integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for assessing and ranking the skills required for IT personnel. Design/methodology/approach This study integrates expert opinions and insights from the literature to identify five key criteria and 21 sub-criteria essential for IT personnel selection. The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to determine the relative importance of each criterion and sub-criterion. These weighted criteria were then utilized in the fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to systematically rank five candidate alternatives based on their suitability for IT roles. Findings Results identified “Objective of factors” to be the most significant criteria, whereas “Assessment Centre Score” as the most viable sub-criterion. Using the integrated model results of fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS candidate, A3 was the most fitted IT personnel, whereas Candidate A4 has emerged as the poor/ unsuitable fit. Practical implications This research helps firms and policymakers use their limited resources efficiently. Furthermore, this study acts as a guideline for future researchers to empirically investigate the impact of listed skills on employee performance. Originality/value This study is a pioneering effort in integrating fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS to address the challenges in IT personnel selection, catering to the intricate layers of human evaluative judgments. Its extended applicability and innovative approach makes it a valuable contribution to the existing body of knowledge, serving as a benchmark for future endeavors in related domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-05-2024-0253
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and ranking the skills required for IT personnel: a hybrid decision-making model using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS

Arun Aggarwal, Vinay Kukreja, Tanvi Verma, Ishani Sharma et al.
5 citations
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
10.53
article

Assessing and ranking the skills required for IT personnel: a hybrid decision-making model using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS

Arun Aggarwal, Vinay Kukreja, Tanvi Verma, Ishani Sharma, Rashmi Aggarwal
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose The hiring process for information technology (IT) personnel, given its high stakes and intricacies, demands an objective, methodical and nuanced approach. The multifaceted nature of IT roles necessitates a comprehensive evaluation methodology to identify and prioritize pertinent skills and competencies. Therefore, this study aims to devise and implement a robust multi-criteria decision-making model integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for assessing and ranking the skills required for IT personnel. Design/methodology/approach This study integrates expert opinions and insights from the literature to identify five key criteria and 21 sub-criteria essential for IT personnel selection. The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to determine the relative importance of each criterion and sub-criterion. These weighted criteria were then utilized in the fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to systematically rank five candidate alternatives based on their suitability for IT roles. Findings Results identified “Objective of factors” to be the most significant criteria, whereas “Assessment Centre Score” as the most viable sub-criterion. Using the integrated model results of fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS candidate, A3 was the most fitted IT personnel, whereas Candidate A4 has emerged as the poor/ unsuitable fit. Practical implications This research helps firms and policymakers use their limited resources efficiently. Furthermore, this study acts as a guideline for future researchers to empirically investigate the impact of listed skills on employee performance. Originality/value This study is a pioneering effort in integrating fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS to address the challenges in IT personnel selection, catering to the intricate layers of human evaluative judgments. Its extended applicability and innovative approach makes it a valuable contribution to the existing body of knowledge, serving as a benchmark for future endeavors in related domains.

Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.