U.S. Spanish and the Standard Language Myth

Abstract: The Spanish spoken in the U.S. contains certain elements from English due to the sustained sociocultural contact between these two languages. Unfortunately, it is for this very reason that many monolingual Spanish speakers (and even some bilinguals) denigrate bilingual varieties of U.S. Spanish, which they see as impure (Mata 2023; Rangel et al. 2015). This negative view of U.S. Spanish is common among “journalists, translators and educators,” as noted by Cecilia Montes-Alcalá (99). Confronting these deeply rooted prejudices at a societal level represents a tremendous challenge. However, this is also the view of some linguists, though it is based principally or wholly on ideology and not on the results of empirical research. As language scholars, we have a role to play in bringing attention to these ideologies within our discipline and questioning them based on empirically grounded studies. In this article we suggest means of employing extant research to better inform the linguistic study of U.S. Spanish, which has wide-ranging implications for current and future research agendas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hispania
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2025.a953558
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

U.S. Spanish and the Standard Language Myth

Mark Waltermire, Daniel J. Villa
2 citations
Hispania
Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
20.85
article

U.S. Spanish and the Standard Language Myth

Mark Waltermire, Daniel J. Villa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The Spanish spoken in the U.S. contains certain elements from English due to the sustained sociocultural contact between these two languages. Unfortunately, it is for this very reason that many monolingual Spanish speakers (and even some bilinguals) denigrate bilingual varieties of U.S. Spanish, which they see as impure (Mata 2023; Rangel et al. 2015). This negative view of U.S. Spanish is common among “journalists, translators and educators,” as noted by Cecilia Montes-Alcalá (99). Confronting these deeply rooted prejudices at a societal level represents a tremendous challenge. However, this is also the view of some linguists, though it is based principally or wholly on ideology and not on the results of empirical research. As language scholars, we have a role to play in bringing attention to these ideologies within our discipline and questioning them based on empirically grounded studies. In this article we suggest means of employing extant research to better inform the linguistic study of U.S. Spanish, which has wide-ranging implications for current and future research agendas.

HispaniaVol. 108(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
20.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

U.S. Spanish and the Standard Language Myth — Mark Waltermire, Daniel J. Villa · Hispania (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS