Co-creation methods for public health research — characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review

This review emphasizes the importance of robust documentation and analysis of co-creation methods to inform their application in public health. Findings support the development of collaborative co-creation processes that are responsive to the needs of diverse populations, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness and cultural sensitivity of the outcomes. This review highlights the potential of co-creation methods to promote equity and inclusion while emphasizing the importance of evaluating and selecting methods tailored to specific objectives, offering a critical resource for planning, conducting, and evaluating co-creation projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02514-4
Citations
37
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
104.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-creation methods for public health research — characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review

Lauren McCaffrey, Vinayak Anand-Kumar, Janneke de Boer, Lea Rahel Delfmann et al.
37 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Health Policy Implementation Science
104.17
article

Co-creation methods for public health research — characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review

Lauren McCaffrey, Vinayak Anand-Kumar, Janneke de Boer, Lea Rahel Delfmann, Artur Steiner, Qingfan An, Giuliana Raffaella Longworth, Danielle Marie Agnello, Quentin Loisel, Sebastien Chastin
article en
37 citations

Abstract

This review emphasizes the importance of robust documentation and analysis of co-creation methods to inform their application in public health. Findings support the development of collaborative co-creation processes that are responsive to the needs of diverse populations, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness and cultural sensitivity of the outcomes. This review highlights the potential of co-creation methods to promote equity and inclusion while emphasizing the importance of evaluating and selecting methods tailored to specific objectives, offering a critical resource for planning, conducting, and evaluating co-creation projects.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 25(1)
Constructor University (DE), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Ghent University (BE), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES), Umeå University (SE)
European Commission
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Health Policy Implementation Science
104.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-creation methods for public health research — characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review — Lauren McCaffrey, Vinayak Anand-Kumar, et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS