Enhancing data protection in AI-driven investment and robo-advisory services: a comparative analysis of EU and China regulatory approaches

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is driving innovation in the financial investment sector, but it also poses significant challenges for protecting investors’ personal information. The extensive data requirements for robo-advice, coupled with technological security risks, insufficient user awareness, trust concerns, and the frequently ambiguous or non-compliant nature of privacy statements, present significant challenges to the protection of investor information. Both the European Union (EU) and China face these challenges, though in distinct ways, with their regulatory frameworks offering opportunities for mutual learning and advancement. To improve the protection of investor data in both regions, it is essential to strengthen legal regulations, increase oversight of robo-advisory platforms, implement innovative regulatory models, and enhance user awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Ethics & Technology
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55092/let20250002
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing data protection in AI-driven investment and robo-advisory services: a comparative analysis of EU and China regulatory approaches

Gaoyang Liang, Lerong Lu
Law Ethics & Technology
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Enhancing data protection in AI-driven investment and robo-advisory services: a comparative analysis of EU and China regulatory approaches

Gaoyang Liang, Lerong Lu
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is driving innovation in the financial investment sector, but it also poses significant challenges for protecting investors’ personal information. The extensive data requirements for robo-advice, coupled with technological security risks, insufficient user awareness, trust concerns, and the frequently ambiguous or non-compliant nature of privacy statements, present significant challenges to the protection of investor information. Both the European Union (EU) and China face these challenges, though in distinct ways, with their regulatory frameworks offering opportunities for mutual learning and advancement. To improve the protection of investor data in both regions, it is essential to strengthen legal regulations, increase oversight of robo-advisory platforms, implement innovative regulatory models, and enhance user awareness.

Law Ethics & Technology
King's College London (GB), Durham University (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing data protection in AI-driven investment and robo-advisory services: a comparative analysis of EU and China regulatory approaches — Gaoyang Liang, Lerong Lu · Law Ethics & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS