Legal Methodology for Selecting Legitimate Targets during Armed Conflict

The selection of legitimate targets during armed conflict is an integral part of international humanitarian law, which aims to limit harm to the civilian population and protect civilian objects from random or unjustified attacks. The study aims to analyse the methods of selecting legitimate targets in armed conflict within the framework of international humanitarian law and identify shortcomings in the existing legal regulation of this process. To achieve this goal, the study used a combination of several methods, in particular, a legal analysis of existing international norms and principles of IHL, a comparative analysis of the application of these principles in different armed conflicts, as well as a critical approach to existing gaps in legal regulation. Using such methods allows for in-depth research into the issues and to identify weaknesses in the legal mechanisms governing the selection of legitimate targets in armed conflicts. The study showed that the principle of distinction, which requires a clear separation of military targets from civilian objects, becomes difficult to apply due to the integration of new technologies capable of simultaneously striking various targets without complete human control. In addition, significant legal uncertainty was found regarding applying the principle of proportionality in the case of using such systems, which is exacerbated by the lack of a clear legal basis for their application. The study indicates that the selection of legitimate targets in armed conflict should be regulated more by using autonomous weapon systems and other new technologies to ensure compliance with distinction, proportionality and military necessity. Since existing legal norms often do not consider the specifics of such technologies, it is necessary to create international agreements that regulate the use of autonomous weapon systems in war conditions, providing liability for unlawful strikes and decision-making without proper control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futurity Economics&Law
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57125/fel.2025.03.25.03
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Methodology for Selecting Legitimate Targets during Armed Conflict

Vasil Nakonechny, Ihor Hanenko, M.H. Chalyi, Vasyl Shut
Futurity Economics&Law
International Law and Human Rights
article

Legal Methodology for Selecting Legitimate Targets during Armed Conflict

Vasil Nakonechny, Ihor Hanenko, M.H. Chalyi, Vasyl Shut
article en

Abstract

The selection of legitimate targets during armed conflict is an integral part of international humanitarian law, which aims to limit harm to the civilian population and protect civilian objects from random or unjustified attacks. The study aims to analyse the methods of selecting legitimate targets in armed conflict within the framework of international humanitarian law and identify shortcomings in the existing legal regulation of this process. To achieve this goal, the study used a combination of several methods, in particular, a legal analysis of existing international norms and principles of IHL, a comparative analysis of the application of these principles in different armed conflicts, as well as a critical approach to existing gaps in legal regulation. Using such methods allows for in-depth research into the issues and to identify weaknesses in the legal mechanisms governing the selection of legitimate targets in armed conflicts. The study showed that the principle of distinction, which requires a clear separation of military targets from civilian objects, becomes difficult to apply due to the integration of new technologies capable of simultaneously striking various targets without complete human control. In addition, significant legal uncertainty was found regarding applying the principle of proportionality in the case of using such systems, which is exacerbated by the lack of a clear legal basis for their application. The study indicates that the selection of legitimate targets in armed conflict should be regulated more by using autonomous weapon systems and other new technologies to ensure compliance with distinction, proportionality and military necessity. Since existing legal norms often do not consider the specifics of such technologies, it is necessary to create international agreements that regulate the use of autonomous weapon systems in war conditions, providing liability for unlawful strikes and decision-making without proper control.

Futurity Economics&LawVol. 5(1)
Kherson National Technical University (UA), Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (UA), Kherson State University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.