Particle Emissions by Mechanical Treatment of Nanocomposites: Emission Library and Applications in Exposure and Risk Assessment

<ns3:p>Background Reworking and use of nanocomposites (materials with incorporated or embedded nanomaterials) are shown to release relevant quantities of particles that can cause risk for the workers or product users. It is mandatory to provide Conditions of Use (CoU) in Exposure Scenarios for the REACH legislation. This requires information on emissions that the registrant is required to report. Regardless of the REACH legislation, emissions are rarely studied or reported. Here, we revised the available emission/release studies considering the mechanical treatment of nanocomposites. Methods A literature review of mechanical treatment emissions measurements was conducted for the years 2017 – 2024. Emission scaling and CoU assessment were demonstrated for sanding, drilling, milling, sawing, and abrasion scenarios. Exposure model performance testing was performed by comparing predicted concentration levels with concentration levels measured in an industrial sanding scenario. Results One out of 32 studies reported emissions and 12 studies contained sufficient contextual information to calculate the emissions. We developed guidelines and created a data collection sheet to help researchers and developers report the emissions from mechanical stress tests. Most studies reported particle number concentrations that are insufficient for risk assessment, where hazard profiles are given in mass dose/concentration. Modelled concentrations were 2.4 times higher than measured concentrations in the industrial sanding scenario. However, due to differences in materials and measurement techniques, uncertainty assessment was not possible to conduct, and the model applicability was not confirmed. Conclusions In REACH legislation, reporting emissions and quantifying CoU for emissions containing nanomaterials is mandatory. Regardless of this, emissions are rarely reported. Emissions are the key factor in predictive exposure modelling and risk assessment. Here, we provide guidance and emission reporting templates and demonstrate how CoU can be quantified efficiently.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19658.1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Particle Emissions by Mechanical Treatment of Nanocomposites: Emission Library and Applications in Exposure and Risk Assessment

Michael A. Jayjock, Antti Joonas Koivisto, Alessia Nicosia, Tareq Hussein et al.
2 citations
Open Research Europe
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
1.99
article

Particle Emissions by Mechanical Treatment of Nanocomposites: Emission Library and Applications in Exposure and Risk Assessment

Michael A. Jayjock, Antti Joonas Koivisto, Alessia Nicosia, Tareq Hussein, Rossella Bengalli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Reworking and use of nanocomposites (materials with incorporated or embedded nanomaterials) are shown to release relevant quantities of particles that can cause risk for the workers or product users. It is mandatory to provide Conditions of Use (CoU) in Exposure Scenarios for the REACH legislation. This requires information on emissions that the registrant is required to report. Regardless of the REACH legislation, emissions are rarely studied or reported. Here, we revised the available emission/release studies considering the mechanical treatment of nanocomposites. Methods A literature review of mechanical treatment emissions measurements was conducted for the years 2017 – 2024. Emission scaling and CoU assessment were demonstrated for sanding, drilling, milling, sawing, and abrasion scenarios. Exposure model performance testing was performed by comparing predicted concentration levels with concentration levels measured in an industrial sanding scenario. Results One out of 32 studies reported emissions and 12 studies contained sufficient contextual information to calculate the emissions. We developed guidelines and created a data collection sheet to help researchers and developers report the emissions from mechanical stress tests. Most studies reported particle number concentrations that are insufficient for risk assessment, where hazard profiles are given in mass dose/concentration. Modelled concentrations were 2.4 times higher than measured concentrations in the industrial sanding scenario. However, due to differences in materials and measurement techniques, uncertainty assessment was not possible to conduct, and the model applicability was not confirmed. Conclusions In REACH legislation, reporting emissions and quantifying CoU for emissions containing nanomaterials is mandatory. Regardless of this, emissions are rarely reported. Emissions are the key factor in predictive exposure modelling and risk assessment. Here, we provide guidance and emission reporting templates and demonstrate how CoU can be quantified efficiently.</ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 5
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.