The Gender Award Gap in German medical societies 2000–2023: the Fritz-Külz-Award as an example

Science prizes contribute to the visibility of researchers within and outside the medical community. Our article contains a descriptive analysis of the prize development in German medical societies since the turn of the millennium, focussing on the development of gender differences and discussing the findings with regard to necessary structural changes and the general significance of prizes in medicine. The study is based on data from all documented prizes and honours awarded by the 183 German medical societies currently organised in the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften) in the period 2000-2023, including the Fritz-Külz-Award in pharmacology. For the first time, our study enables a differentiated overall view of the diverse prize culture in German medical societies, with 1213 awards (including 201 scholarships). The results show that the gender award gap found in international studies, particularly for prestigious awards, has continuously narrowed in the awarding practice of German medical societies since 2000. However, a gender-specific imbalance is still recognisable, particularly in the case of prestigious honorary prizes and more highly endowed research prizes. Differences between the specialist societies, depending on the speciality, the respective proportion of female specialists and the proportion of female scientists among the members must be investigated in further detailed studies. The specialist societies are therefore called upon to make their nomination and application practices even more transparent in order to better recognise potential disadvantages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-03892-8
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Gender Award Gap in German medical societies 2000–2023: the Fritz-Külz-Award as an example

Adrian Loerbroks, Thorsten Halling, Nils Hansson, Annegret Dreher et al.
9 citations
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Diversity and Career in Medicine
34.80
article

The Gender Award Gap in German medical societies 2000–2023: the Fritz-Külz-Award as an example

Adrian Loerbroks, Thorsten Halling, Nils Hansson, Annegret Dreher, Viola Mambrey, Chantal Marazia, Roland Seifert, Jessica Marie Steinert
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Science prizes contribute to the visibility of researchers within and outside the medical community. Our article contains a descriptive analysis of the prize development in German medical societies since the turn of the millennium, focussing on the development of gender differences and discussing the findings with regard to necessary structural changes and the general significance of prizes in medicine. The study is based on data from all documented prizes and honours awarded by the 183 German medical societies currently organised in the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften) in the period 2000-2023, including the Fritz-Külz-Award in pharmacology. For the first time, our study enables a differentiated overall view of the diverse prize culture in German medical societies, with 1213 awards (including 201 scholarships). The results show that the gender award gap found in international studies, particularly for prestigious awards, has continuously narrowed in the awarding practice of German medical societies since 2000. However, a gender-specific imbalance is still recognisable, particularly in the case of prestigious honorary prizes and more highly endowed research prizes. Differences between the specialist societies, depending on the speciality, the respective proportion of female specialists and the proportion of female scientists among the members must be investigated in further detailed studies. The specialist societies are therefore called upon to make their nomination and application practices even more transparent in order to better recognise potential disadvantages.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of PharmacologyVol. 398(8)
University of Milan (IT), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
34.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.