Integrating Satellite-Based Precipitation Analysis: A Case Study in Norfolk, Virginia

In many developing cities, the scarcity of adequate observed precipitation stations, due to constraints such as limited space, urban growth, and maintenance challenges, compromises data reliability. This study explores the use of satellite-based precipitation products (SbPPs) as a solution to supplement missing data over the long term, thereby enabling more accurate environmental analysis and decision-making. Specifically, the effectiveness of SbPPs in Norfolk, Virginia, is assessed by comparing them with observed precipitation data from Norfolk International Airport (NIA) using common bias adjustment methods. The study applies three different methods to correct biases caused by sensor limitations and calibration discrepancies and then identifies the most effective methods based on statistical indicators, detection capability indices, and graphical methods. Bias adjustment methods include additive bias correction (ABC), which subtracts systematic errors; multiplicative bias correction (MBC), which scales satellite data to match observed data; and distribution transformation normalization (DTN), which aligns the statistical distribution of satellite data with observations. Additionally, the study addresses the uncertainties in SbPPs for estimating precipitation, preparing practitioners for the challenges in practical applications. The additive bias correction (ABC) method overestimated mean monthly precipitation, while the PERSIANN-Cloud Classification System (CCS), adjusted with multiplicative bias correction (MBC), was found to be the most accurate bias-adjusted model. The MBC method resulted in slight PBias adjustments of 0.09% (CCS), 0.10% (CDR), and 0.15% (PERSIANN) in mean monthly precipitation estimates, while the DTN method produced larger adjustments of 21.36% (CCS), 31.74% (CDR), and 19.27% (PERSIANN), with CCS, when bias corrected using MBC, identified as the most accurate SbPP for Norfolk, Virginia. This case study not only provides insights into the technical processes but also serves as a guideline for integrating advanced hydrological modeling and urban resilience strategies, contributing to improved strategies for climate change adaptation and disaster preparedness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6030049
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Satellite-Based Precipitation Analysis: A Case Study in Norfolk, Virginia

Dalya Ismael, Imiya M. Chathuranika
3 citations
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
3.90
article

Integrating Satellite-Based Precipitation Analysis: A Case Study in Norfolk, Virginia

Dalya Ismael, Imiya M. Chathuranika
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In many developing cities, the scarcity of adequate observed precipitation stations, due to constraints such as limited space, urban growth, and maintenance challenges, compromises data reliability. This study explores the use of satellite-based precipitation products (SbPPs) as a solution to supplement missing data over the long term, thereby enabling more accurate environmental analysis and decision-making. Specifically, the effectiveness of SbPPs in Norfolk, Virginia, is assessed by comparing them with observed precipitation data from Norfolk International Airport (NIA) using common bias adjustment methods. The study applies three different methods to correct biases caused by sensor limitations and calibration discrepancies and then identifies the most effective methods based on statistical indicators, detection capability indices, and graphical methods. Bias adjustment methods include additive bias correction (ABC), which subtracts systematic errors; multiplicative bias correction (MBC), which scales satellite data to match observed data; and distribution transformation normalization (DTN), which aligns the statistical distribution of satellite data with observations. Additionally, the study addresses the uncertainties in SbPPs for estimating precipitation, preparing practitioners for the challenges in practical applications. The additive bias correction (ABC) method overestimated mean monthly precipitation, while the PERSIANN-Cloud Classification System (CCS), adjusted with multiplicative bias correction (MBC), was found to be the most accurate bias-adjusted model. The MBC method resulted in slight PBias adjustments of 0.09% (CCS), 0.10% (CDR), and 0.15% (PERSIANN) in mean monthly precipitation estimates, while the DTN method produced larger adjustments of 21.36% (CCS), 31.74% (CDR), and 19.27% (PERSIANN), with CCS, when bias corrected using MBC, identified as the most accurate SbPP for Norfolk, Virginia. This case study not only provides insights into the technical processes but also serves as a guideline for integrating advanced hydrological modeling and urban resilience strategies, contributing to improved strategies for climate change adaptation and disaster preparedness.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 6(3)
Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.