Embracing causal complexity: An analytical framework based on Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities

Despite the recognition of the benefits of the complex causality perspective to understand organizational phenomena, it remains difficult to apply. To address this gap, we propose an analytical framework ontologically grounded in Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities. This framework unfolds in three steps: First, it identifies the four primary and per se causes; second, the other causes, including accidents, instruments and secondary causes; and third, it examines their interrelations through two types of causalities—reciprocal and total, as well as partial convergent or divergent. By providing an ontological foundation for causes and causalities our framework allows researchers to investigate any organizational phenomena, thereby operationalizing and deepening our understanding of causal complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peer Community Journal
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.532
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embracing causal complexity: An analytical framework based on Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities

Hélène Delacour, Andrea Zaara
Peer Community Journal
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Embracing causal complexity: An analytical framework based on Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities

Hélène Delacour, Andrea Zaara
article en

Abstract

Despite the recognition of the benefits of the complex causality perspective to understand organizational phenomena, it remains difficult to apply. To address this gap, we propose an analytical framework ontologically grounded in Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities. This framework unfolds in three steps: First, it identifies the four primary and per se causes; second, the other causes, including accidents, instruments and secondary causes; and third, it examines their interrelations through two types of causalities—reciprocal and total, as well as partial convergent or divergent. By providing an ontological foundation for causes and causalities our framework allows researchers to investigate any organizational phenomena, thereby operationalizing and deepening our understanding of causal complexity.

Peer Community JournalVol. 5
SGS (Switzerland) (CH), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Embracing causal complexity: An analytical framework based on Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities — Hélène Delacour, Andrea Zaara · Peer Community Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS