The Relationship between Performance and Confidence in the Secondary-School Version of the Test of Calculus and Vectors in Mathematics and Physics

Abstract In this study, we compare students’ performance in solving mathematics and physics exercises with their confidence level in answering them. Accurate self-assessment of confidence is known to positively correlate with academic achievement, yet confidence is often neglected when designing teaching interventions. The research presented here aimed at investigating the relationship between students’ confidence levels and test scores and its evolution over a short lesson cycle. We also examine the presence of gender-based differences. The study was first conducted with a pilot group of 43 secondary school students and later expanded to 260 students. A modified version of the Test of Calculus and Vectors in Mathematics and Physics was used, incorporating confidence assessment for each item. Results suggest that, while test scores and confidence levels improved overall following the lesson cycle, this did not translate into a better “calibration” of the students (i.e., the alignment between confidence level and actual performance). Specifically, male students became more overconfident, whereas female students became more underconfident. These findings support taking into account confidence when designing teaching interventions and using confidence assessment practices to train students’ self-assessment skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10560-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship between Performance and Confidence in the Secondary-School Version of the Test of Calculus and Vectors in Mathematics and Physics

Stefania Lippiello, Marta Carli, Ornella Pantano
1 citations
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
8.93
article

The Relationship between Performance and Confidence in the Secondary-School Version of the Test of Calculus and Vectors in Mathematics and Physics

Stefania Lippiello, Marta Carli, Ornella Pantano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we compare students’ performance in solving mathematics and physics exercises with their confidence level in answering them. Accurate self-assessment of confidence is known to positively correlate with academic achievement, yet confidence is often neglected when designing teaching interventions. The research presented here aimed at investigating the relationship between students’ confidence levels and test scores and its evolution over a short lesson cycle. We also examine the presence of gender-based differences. The study was first conducted with a pilot group of 43 secondary school students and later expanded to 260 students. A modified version of the Test of Calculus and Vectors in Mathematics and Physics was used, incorporating confidence assessment for each item. Results suggest that, while test scores and confidence levels improved overall following the lesson cycle, this did not translate into a better “calibration” of the students (i.e., the alignment between confidence level and actual performance). Specifically, male students became more overconfident, whereas female students became more underconfident. These findings support taking into account confidence when designing teaching interventions and using confidence assessment practices to train students’ self-assessment skills.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics EducationVol. 23(7)
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova (IT), Ospedale San Bassiano (IT)
Università degli Studi di Padova
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.