Moving Beyond the Hype/Doom Cycles of Generative AI Discourse in Publishing

Generative AI has become a buzzword within the publishing industry over the last two years, with responses often falling into either high optimism or an overall sense of doom. We are now at a suitable distance from the launch of ChatGPT to appraise these developments from a more nuanced perspective and begin to explore their connections to the longer history of AI. In this article, I offer some suggestions for how publishers might approach this topic. With the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022, ‘Generative AI’ has been heralded as one of the most significant technological breakthroughs since the printing press. Cutting through the hyperbole and the numerous possible counterexamples, the comparison is useful. The transition from manuscript to print culture was an on-going process rather than a sharp shift and we have not stopped prizing forms of manuscript writing centuries later. One mode of communication does not completely displace another; there’s little signs that generative AI will eradicate our need and desire for human creativity in fields such as publishing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interscript
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2398-4732.2004
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving Beyond the Hype/Doom Cycles of Generative AI Discourse in Publishing

Simon Rowberry
Interscript
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Moving Beyond the Hype/Doom Cycles of Generative AI Discourse in Publishing

Simon Rowberry
article en

Abstract

Generative AI has become a buzzword within the publishing industry over the last two years, with responses often falling into either high optimism or an overall sense of doom. We are now at a suitable distance from the launch of ChatGPT to appraise these developments from a more nuanced perspective and begin to explore their connections to the longer history of AI. In this article, I offer some suggestions for how publishers might approach this topic. With the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022, ‘Generative AI’ has been heralded as one of the most significant technological breakthroughs since the printing press. Cutting through the hyperbole and the numerous possible counterexamples, the comparison is useful. The transition from manuscript to print culture was an on-going process rather than a sharp shift and we have not stopped prizing forms of manuscript writing centuries later. One mode of communication does not completely displace another; there’s little signs that generative AI will eradicate our need and desire for human creativity in fields such as publishing.

InterscriptVol. 0(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Moving Beyond the Hype/Doom Cycles of Generative AI Discourse in Publishing — Simon Rowberry · Interscript (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS