Continental evaluation of GPM IMERG V07B precipitation on a sub-daily scale

Satellite-based precipitation products have significantly advanced applications in hydrology, climate science, and related fields. Despite the significant role of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission in monitoring global precipitation dynamics over the past decade, its performance on sub-daily time scales remains insufficiently explored on a global scale. This study provides a continental assessment of the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) V07B Final Run using extensive hourly ground observations across contiguous United States (CONUS), West Europe, and East Asia. The results demonstrate that IMERG captures precipitation amounts with reasonable accuracy, yielding a median Kling–Gupta efficiency of 0.31 and a median relative bias of 7 %. This bias is primarily attributed to overestimated precipitation frequency and underestimated intensity. However, its performance varies significantly with seasons, land surface attributes, and precipitation types, with better performance generally observed in spring and fall, as well as in temperate and humid climates, and low-altitude regions. While IMERG performs well in detecting moderate precipitation, it struggles with drizzle and moderate-to-extreme events, particularly those exceeding 5 mm/h. Additionally, diurnal performance variability is evident, with the highest accuracy observed in the morning (0600–0900) and the lowest in the afternoon (1400–1700). These findings underscore the variable performance of IMERG and highlight the need for further improvements, especially in capturing extreme precipitation in regions with complex geo-topographic conditions. • A continental and sub-daily evaluation for GPM IMERG V07B Final Run. • IMERG captures total amount, with over−/under- estimated frequency/intensity. • IMERG shows divergent performance across seasons, climates, and geo-topography. • IMERG underestimates precipitation extremes, particularly for high-intensity events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing of Environment
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114690
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continental evaluation of GPM IMERG V07B precipitation on a sub-daily scale

Guoqiang Tang, Yuting Yang, Jinghua Xiong
20 citations
Remote Sensing of Environment
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
26.02
article

Continental evaluation of GPM IMERG V07B precipitation on a sub-daily scale

Guoqiang Tang, Yuting Yang, Jinghua Xiong
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Satellite-based precipitation products have significantly advanced applications in hydrology, climate science, and related fields. Despite the significant role of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission in monitoring global precipitation dynamics over the past decade, its performance on sub-daily time scales remains insufficiently explored on a global scale. This study provides a continental assessment of the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) V07B Final Run using extensive hourly ground observations across contiguous United States (CONUS), West Europe, and East Asia. The results demonstrate that IMERG captures precipitation amounts with reasonable accuracy, yielding a median Kling–Gupta efficiency of 0.31 and a median relative bias of 7 %. This bias is primarily attributed to overestimated precipitation frequency and underestimated intensity. However, its performance varies significantly with seasons, land surface attributes, and precipitation types, with better performance generally observed in spring and fall, as well as in temperate and humid climates, and low-altitude regions. While IMERG performs well in detecting moderate precipitation, it struggles with drizzle and moderate-to-extreme events, particularly those exceeding 5 mm/h. Additionally, diurnal performance variability is evident, with the highest accuracy observed in the morning (0600–0900) and the lowest in the afternoon (1400–1700). These findings underscore the variable performance of IMERG and highlight the need for further improvements, especially in capturing extreme precipitation in regions with complex geo-topographic conditions. • A continental and sub-daily evaluation for GPM IMERG V07B Final Run. • IMERG captures total amount, with over−/under- estimated frequency/intensity. • IMERG shows divergent performance across seasons, climates, and geo-topography. • IMERG underestimates precipitation extremes, particularly for high-intensity events.

Remote Sensing of EnvironmentVol. 321
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Qinghai Provincial Department of Science and Technology
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
26.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.