The relationship between interindividual differences and global/local processing

<ns3:p>Background Global and local processing refer to cognitive styles that prioritize either the overall structure or the finer details of stimuli. Previous research suggests that these processing tendencies may be linked to personality traits as measured by the Big Five Inventory (BFI), but empirical evidence remains inconsistent. Methods Two experiments investigated whether personality traits influence the transfer of processing styles across tasks. Experiment 1 used a prime-probe paradigm, while Experiment 2 employed a classical Global-Local Task (GLT). Results Experiment 1 replicated near-transfer effects of processing modes on reaction times and errors but found no significant correlation between personality traits and processing transfer. However, a negative correlation emerged between Conscientiousness and the Global Precedence effect, suggesting that individuals high in Conscientiousness favor local processing. Experiment 2 failed to replicate this but instead found a negative correlation between Neuroticism and the Global Precedence effect, indicating that highly neurotic individuals may also show a preference for local processing. Conclusions These findings provide preliminary evidence that global/local processing modes relate to personality traits, though the exact nature of these relationships remains unclear. Further research is needed to clarify these associations and assess their robustness across different paradigms.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19492.1
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between interindividual differences and global/local processing

Alberto De Luca, Bernhard Hommel, Stephan Verschoor
Open Research Europe
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

The relationship between interindividual differences and global/local processing

Alberto De Luca, Bernhard Hommel, Stephan Verschoor
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Global and local processing refer to cognitive styles that prioritize either the overall structure or the finer details of stimuli. Previous research suggests that these processing tendencies may be linked to personality traits as measured by the Big Five Inventory (BFI), but empirical evidence remains inconsistent. Methods Two experiments investigated whether personality traits influence the transfer of processing styles across tasks. Experiment 1 used a prime-probe paradigm, while Experiment 2 employed a classical Global-Local Task (GLT). Results Experiment 1 replicated near-transfer effects of processing modes on reaction times and errors but found no significant correlation between personality traits and processing transfer. However, a negative correlation emerged between Conscientiousness and the Global Precedence effect, suggesting that individuals high in Conscientiousness favor local processing. Experiment 2 failed to replicate this but instead found a negative correlation between Neuroticism and the Global Precedence effect, indicating that highly neurotic individuals may also show a preference for local processing. Conclusions These findings provide preliminary evidence that global/local processing modes relate to personality traits, though the exact nature of these relationships remains unclear. Further research is needed to clarify these associations and assess their robustness across different paradigms.</ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 5
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.