Repairing Australia’s inland river and groundwater systems: nine priority actions, benefits and the finance gap

Inland river and groundwater systems in Australia, as elsewhere, have been heavily overexploited, modified and degraded and are subject to increasing pressures from anthropogenic activities and climate change. Here, we propose the following nine priority actions to repair these critical parts of our landscape not currently being implemented or not at a sufficient scale: (1) riparian revegetation, (2) incentivisation to retire riparian farmland, (3) water recovery to achieve sustainable levels of take in the Murray–Darling Basin, (4) restoration of riverine connectivity through constraints management, (5) removal or modification of fish barriers, (6) installation of cold-water pollution device on priority large dams, (7) installation of fish diversion screens on all irrigation pumps, (8) capping of open bores and conversion of open bore-drains remaining in the Great Artesian Basin and (9) restoration of groundwater extraction in the Murray–Darling Basin to a sustainable level of take. We estimate the scale and costs associated with each priority action and synthesise evidence demonstrating benefits. We discuss the importance of enabling and supporting regional communities, especially Indigenous nations, to implement these actions. To implement the priority actions outlined here at the scale indicated, our estimates suggest approximate annual investment from 2025 to 2054 of A$3.1 billion (2022 dollar values). Riparian revegetation across 14.4 × 106 ha could sequester 1.6 × 109 tonnes of CO2, offsetting ~37% of Australia’s net emissions over the next 30 years by using high-integrity carbon methods. Revenue generated through the carbon market could cover between 37 and 72% of the costs, reducing investment needed to between A$0.9 billion and A$2.0 billion (2022 dollar values).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine and Freshwater Research
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/mf24160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repairing Australia’s inland river and groundwater systems: nine priority actions, benefits and the finance gap

Bradley Moggridge, Lee J. Baumgartner, Celine Steinfeld, Fran Sheldon et al.
1 citations
Marine and Freshwater Research
Water resources management and optimization
1.15
article

Repairing Australia’s inland river and groundwater systems: nine priority actions, benefits and the finance gap

Bradley Moggridge, Lee J. Baumgartner, Celine Steinfeld, Fran Sheldon, Samantha J. Capon, Jamie Pittock, Matthew C. Ward, Anderson L. Ward, D. L. Medaris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Inland river and groundwater systems in Australia, as elsewhere, have been heavily overexploited, modified and degraded and are subject to increasing pressures from anthropogenic activities and climate change. Here, we propose the following nine priority actions to repair these critical parts of our landscape not currently being implemented or not at a sufficient scale: (1) riparian revegetation, (2) incentivisation to retire riparian farmland, (3) water recovery to achieve sustainable levels of take in the Murray–Darling Basin, (4) restoration of riverine connectivity through constraints management, (5) removal or modification of fish barriers, (6) installation of cold-water pollution device on priority large dams, (7) installation of fish diversion screens on all irrigation pumps, (8) capping of open bores and conversion of open bore-drains remaining in the Great Artesian Basin and (9) restoration of groundwater extraction in the Murray–Darling Basin to a sustainable level of take. We estimate the scale and costs associated with each priority action and synthesise evidence demonstrating benefits. We discuss the importance of enabling and supporting regional communities, especially Indigenous nations, to implement these actions. To implement the priority actions outlined here at the scale indicated, our estimates suggest approximate annual investment from 2025 to 2054 of A$3.1 billion (2022 dollar values). Riparian revegetation across 14.4 × 106 ha could sequester 1.6 × 109 tonnes of CO2, offsetting ~37% of Australia’s net emissions over the next 30 years by using high-integrity carbon methods. Revenue generated through the carbon market could cover between 37 and 72% of the costs, reducing investment needed to between A$0.9 billion and A$2.0 billion (2022 dollar values).

Marine and Freshwater ResearchVol. 76(4)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Griffith University (AU), Australian National University (AU), Union of Concerned Scientists (US), Charles Sturt University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), IAC (United States) (US)
John T. Reid Charitable Trusts, David and Elaine Potter Foundation, Ian Potter Foundation, Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Water resources management and optimization
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.