Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial

Providing cash incentive for completing peer review reports resulted in a modest increase in the share of invited reviewers who complete reviews for a specialty medical journal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006637
Citations
20
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial

Christopher Cotton, Timothy G. Buchman, David M. Maslove, Abid Alam et al.
20 citations
Critical Care Medicine
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
27.97
article

Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial

Christopher Cotton, Timothy G. Buchman, David M. Maslove, Abid Alam, Sophie Tosta
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Providing cash incentive for completing peer review reports resulted in a modest increase in the share of invited reviewers who complete reviews for a specialty medical journal.

Critical Care MedicineVol. 53(6)
Emory University (US), Queen's University (CA), Society of Critical Care Medicine (US), Kingston Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
27.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.