Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?

Authors

Brett O. Gardner
Daniel C. Murrie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4195-1238)
Lucy A. Guarnera (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4367-7647)
Scott D. Bender

Institutions

University of Virginia (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Law and Human Behavior
Published: 2024-10-01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000589
Citations: 1
Primary Topic: Forensic and Genetic Research
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.55

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?

Brett O. Gardner, Daniel C. Murrie, Lucy A. Guarnera, Scott D. Bender

Oct 1, 2024

1 citations

Law and Human Behavior

Forensic and Genetic Research

0.55

article

Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?

Brett O. Gardner, Daniel C. Murrie, Lucy A. Guarnera, Scott D. Bender

October 1, 2024article en

1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Law and Human BehaviorVol. 48(5-6)

University of Virginia (US)

Gender equality

Openalex Percentile: Top 23%

Forensic and Genetic Research

0.55

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering? — Brett O. Gardner, Daniel C. Murrie, et al. · Law and Human Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS