Does engaging in reason elaboration mitigate bias in mock jurors’ evaluations of confession evidence?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000595
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does engaging in reason elaboration mitigate bias in mock jurors’ evaluations of confession evidence?

Amelia Mindthoff, A. Perry, Skye A. Woestehoff, Christian A. Meissner
1 links
Law and Human Behavior
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Does engaging in reason elaboration mitigate bias in mock jurors’ evaluations of confession evidence?

Amelia Mindthoff, A. Perry, Skye A. Woestehoff, Christian A. Meissner
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Law and Human BehaviorVol. 48(5-6)
Iowa State University (US), Coastal Carolina University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does engaging in reason elaboration mitigate bias in mock jurors’ evaluations of confession evidence? — Amelia Mindthoff, A. Perry, et al. · Law and Human Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS