Performance of a Dual-Sensor Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback System in Estimating Compression Depth and Rate During Simulated Chest Compressions

Abstract This study evaluated the performance of a dual-sensor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback system in estimating chest compression depth and rate over a range of depth and rate combinations during rigid and compliant surface conditions using a computer-controlled motion system to simulate chest compressions. Ten dual-sensor CPR pads were tested using a computer-controlled motion system which simulated chest compressions at target depths of 1.9, 3.8, 4.8, 6.4, and 8.9 cm and target rates of 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140 compressions per minute (cpm). A rigid surface was simulated by applying motion only to the anterior sensor, and a compliant surface was simulated by applying motion to both the anterior and posterior sensor, challenging the algorithm to calculate a net compression depth by subtracting motion of the posterior sensor. For all simulated compressions, including every rate and depth combination and for both rigid and compliant surface simulations, the mean (±sd) depth error was 0.05 (±0.08) cm and the rate error was −0.55 (±1.44) cpm. A dual-sensor CPR system accurately estimates compression depth within ±0.25 cm and compression rate within ±3 cpm over a wide range and combination of clinically relevant chest compression depths and rates during both rigid and compliant surface simulations. Use of a computer-controlled motion system provides a more direct assessment of accuracy than manual compressions performed on instrumented manikins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Devices
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of a Dual-Sensor Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback System in Estimating Compression Depth and Rate During Simulated Chest Compressions

Jeffrey B. Gould, Joshua W. Lampe, P. Giacometti, J Badin et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Devices
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
article

Performance of a Dual-Sensor Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback System in Estimating Compression Depth and Rate During Simulated Chest Compressions

Jeffrey B. Gould, Joshua W. Lampe, P. Giacometti, J Badin, Naghmeh Mosofi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated the performance of a dual-sensor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback system in estimating chest compression depth and rate over a range of depth and rate combinations during rigid and compliant surface conditions using a computer-controlled motion system to simulate chest compressions. Ten dual-sensor CPR pads were tested using a computer-controlled motion system which simulated chest compressions at target depths of 1.9, 3.8, 4.8, 6.4, and 8.9 cm and target rates of 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140 compressions per minute (cpm). A rigid surface was simulated by applying motion only to the anterior sensor, and a compliant surface was simulated by applying motion to both the anterior and posterior sensor, challenging the algorithm to calculate a net compression depth by subtracting motion of the posterior sensor. For all simulated compressions, including every rate and depth combination and for both rigid and compliant surface simulations, the mean (±sd) depth error was 0.05 (±0.08) cm and the rate error was −0.55 (±1.44) cpm. A dual-sensor CPR system accurately estimates compression depth within ±0.25 cm and compression rate within ±3 cpm over a wide range and combination of clinically relevant chest compression depths and rates during both rigid and compliant surface simulations. Use of a computer-controlled motion system provides a more direct assessment of accuracy than manual compressions performed on instrumented manikins.

Journal of Medical DevicesVol. 19(2)
Waters (United States) (US), Kanadevia (Japan) (JP), Scientific Solutions (United States) (US), ZSX Medical (United States) (US), ZOLL Medical Corporation (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.